By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker demonstrates collaboration with colleagues who share similar positions (Jaak Valge, Martin Helme), citing their articles and lines of reasoning. No readiness for compromise is apparent regarding the issue of e-voting; instead, a national referendum is proposed as a solution if the parliament and the Supreme Court fail to resolve the problem, indicating a serious commitment to the ideal of democracy.

The speaker is calling for cross-party cooperation, stressing that amending the law is an apolitical matter that needs to be addressed regardless of whether one is in the coalition or the opposition. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of finding an adequate and workable solution that meets the requirements of the rule of law.

No data available

Insufficient data.

The speaker references their colleague Jaak Valge, who explained the historical context, suggesting cooperation within their own political group. However, the style adopted toward the broader parliamentary majority is confrontational and accusatory, expressing hope that the situation will change, yet showing no openness to compromise with the majority.

The speeches are purely oppositional and critical, focusing on challenging the actions of the prime minister and the government. There is a complete absence of any reference to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bipartisan activity.

There is not enough data.

The collaborative style is evident in the thorough citation of Martin Ehala's article, utilizing his arguments both to support one's own position and to frame the question. Data regarding inter-party or legislative cooperation is absent.

Insufficient data