By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session, engaging in multiple debates on the same day and posing questions regarding consecutive expert presentations (first, second, third). This demonstrates a systematic handling of the topic and comprehensive information gathering.

The speaker actively participated in the plenary session on April 21, 2025, focusing on the discussion concerning the formation of the investigative committee. Patterns of activity indicate the monitoring of recent media articles (Eesti Päevaleht) and legal disputes (Riigikohus) and their subsequent use in their argumentation.

The speaker is also active outside the Parliament chamber, citing recent participation in a town hall meeting in Saaremaa. This points to a pattern where the politician gathers input and information directly from local communities.

Insufficient data.

The patterns of activity are limited to participating in the plenary session and discussing the Chancellor of Justice's submission, where a longer and detailed analysis is presented. Previously, there was active participation in the bill's proceedings, submitting amendments and warning against unconstitutionality.

The speaker is active during plenary sessions, addressing multiple different bills in a single day (covering taxation, security, and foreign policy) and frequently posing clarifying questions. They reference prior involvement in the bill readings and communication with relevant interest groups (specifically mentioning the letter from Pühtitsa Convent). They repeatedly request additional time for their address.

The speaker is an active participant in the Riigikogu information session, although he notes that he struggled for several weeks to get the floor, which indicates a persistent desire to raise urgent issues before Parliament. He also refers to a previous precise formulation of a topic, which earned recognition.

The pattern of activity indicates active participation in the plenary session in April 2025, raising repeated and substantive questions regarding the details of the draft bill. The activity focuses on parliamentary work and the verification of the opposing side's claims.