By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The speaker is actively cooperating with his colleague Kalle Grünthal, having co-sponsored the draft bill. This demonstrates a willingness for legislative cooperation, likely within the faction.

The style of cooperation is primarily critical and independent, but the speaker agrees with the previous speaker on the need to reduce the project-based approach, cut bureaucracy, and offer smaller grants. There are no references to broader cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.

The individual expresses a wish to approach the car tax "with great goodwill" and "to engage constructively," suggesting a theoretical openness to dialogue. However, in practical interactions with the minister, the style is demanding and interrogative, focusing heavily on the government's errors.

Not enough data.

The cooperative approach emphasizes the separation of the executive and legislative branches, deliberately leaving the physical fate of the Bronze Soldier (such as melting or relocation) for the government to decide. The simplicity of the draft bill was chosen specifically to avoid disputes over decisions that fall within the purview of the executive branch.

Insufficient data.

The data indicates a lack of cooperation, since the speaker notes that the government always rejects the solutions proposed by the opposition. The standard argument employed by the government precludes substantive cooperation and the search for compromises.

There is no information regarding cooperation or compromises; the focus is on convincing colleagues to vote in favor of the submitted bill.

There is too little data.