By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

Based on the data, two appearances can be seen during the same session, consistently focusing on the topic of pensions and inflation, as well as ministerial responsibility. Data is unavailable regarding the frequency or pattern of other appearances.

There isn't enough data.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, repeatedly raising procedural questions and delivering an extended speech on the same core topic (e-voting and the related draft legislation). This activity focused on criticizing the actions of the Riigikogu Board and the committee, and highlighting deficiencies in the collective petition procedure.

The subject focuses on presenting and defending the draft legislation during the plenary session, responding to colleagues' questions concerning the sharing of information related to facts, resources, and the current crisis situation. They are actively engaged in researching the background of the draft, including analyzing the status of neighboring countries' websites.

All appearances took place during the plenary session in the form of questions addressed to the ministers, indicating active participation in parliamentary oversight mechanisms. The delivery is rhythmic and focuses on presenting specific data before posing the question.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, presenting the bill and answering questions, which demonstrates a clear focus on the legislative initiative. Their participation in the Culture Committee and the passionate debates that took place there are also mentioned.

The speaker is extremely active during the session, posing repetitive and detailed questions to both the Prime Minister and the Minister of the Interior, and repeatedly requesting additional time (three minutes). A clear pattern has emerged: criticism regarding the slow pace of scheduling inquiries on the agenda and the short working hours of the session, coupled with demands for the session chair to maintain stricter order and permit interjections.