By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Uibo

The primary opposition is aimed at the government/minister concerning the state's poor performance and broken promises. The criticism is both procedural and fiscal, centering on the government's failure to sign a contract, which subsequently necessitated paying compensation to the entrepreneurs. The speaker sharply criticizes the removal of the entrepreneurs from the project after the state had reneged on its commitment.

The primary criticism is leveled against the Isamaa party, which is being accused of scaling back its ambitions concerning energy targets. The critique is grounded in both policy and data, casting doubt on the opponents’ understanding of international climate trends. It warns of the dreadful future costs that will arise from the opponents’ failure to act.

A representative of Eesti 200 sharply criticizes political forces who see threats, not opportunities, in new technologies, and cling to outdated models of the past. They also oppose those who believe that Estonia cannot be more than a simple outsourcing country. The criticism is aimed at vision and political complacency, not at individuals.

The opposition is being sharply criticized for creating an unrealistic and one-sided impression, suggesting that the government is fleecing citizens and stealing money. The criticism is aimed at the opposition's irresponsible rhetoric and its disregard for the country's financial situation, which creates the impression that the coalition is an "extremely evil government."