By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Uibo
Total Sessions: 42
Fully Profiled: 42
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at the previous political course, where the budget deficit grew and the national debt increased too rapidly, a trend they now wish to reverse. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on putting an end to irresponsible fiscal management, but specific opponents or groups are neither named nor personally attacked.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker addresses a critical question to the government minister concerning the state's finances and the strategy for the 2026 budget. The criticism focuses on the substance of the policy and the potential lack of equilibrium, rather than being directed at the minister personally.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Direct political opponents are not criticized; instead, the criticism is aimed at irresponsible debt-based living, which is viewed as an escape from the underlying problem. Excessive bureaucracy is also criticized for stifling innovation within the business environment.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Criticism is not being offered; instead, we are seeking clarification regarding the scope of the regulation to prevent any unintended negative impact on traditional cooperatives.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The objection is aimed at the agenda changes (2024-04-29), but specific opponents or the substance of the criticism are not detailed, apart from the procedural objection itself. The criticism targets organizational decisions, not substantive policy.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
While direct confrontation is not expressed, criticism is leveled against the current national practice concerning the expanded deployment of speed cameras. In a second address, the Isamaa party is challenged to support tax relief for families with children, thereby casting doubt on their willingness to back this socio-political measure.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the section of the draft bill that would regulate the artistic aspects of a cultural work (the Song Festival), such as the repertoire. This opposition is intense and ideological, as the speaker sees it as a threat to civic initiative and compares it to state mandates under the former political regime.
2025-05-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the government/minister concerning the state's poor performance and broken promises. The criticism is both procedural and fiscal, centering on the government's failure to sign a contract, which subsequently necessitated paying compensation to the entrepreneurs. The speaker sharply criticizes the removal of the entrepreneurs from the project after the state had reneged on its commitment.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is leveled against the Isamaa party, which is being accused of scaling back its ambitions concerning energy targets. The critique is grounded in both policy and data, casting doubt on the opponents’ understanding of international climate trends. It warns of the dreadful future costs that will arise from the opponents’ failure to act.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
A representative of Eesti 200 sharply criticizes political forces who see threats, not opportunities, in new technologies, and cling to outdated models of the past. They also oppose those who believe that Estonia cannot be more than a simple outsourcing country. The criticism is aimed at vision and political complacency, not at individuals.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is being sharply criticized for creating an unrealistic and one-sided impression, suggesting that the government is fleecing citizens and stealing money. The criticism is aimed at the opposition's irresponsible rhetoric and its disregard for the country's financial situation, which creates the impression that the coalition is an "extremely evil government."
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism targets the government's previous actions or direction (referring to the "reshuffled government") and the lack of cooperation among local municipalities when planning onshore wind farms. The critique is policy-driven and procedural, focusing on finding solutions to help the public.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
While direct opposition is not voiced, a policy-based challenge has been issued, requiring a comparison and justification for why the EKRE bill is superior to the similar Isamaa bill. The criticism targets the substantive effectiveness and clarity of the draft legislation, rather than individuals or procedures.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism targets the state's unreliability as a private sector partner, citing as examples the public statements made by the Deputy Secretary General of the Ministry of Climate and the subsequent cancellation of the film campus project. The opposition (Mart Maastik) is also criticized for failing to grasp the subject matter (private funding) and for lacking constructive ideas, while emphasizing that this issue transcends partisan politics.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
He/She opposes those forces that do not adhere to established law and organize information operations in front of the Riigikogu. On the international level, he/she calls into question Hungary’s decision to block sanctions against Patriarch Kirill, citing undesirable foreign policy conduct.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and the conflicting signals given by the United States administration. There is no criticism of domestic opponents; the focus is on foreign policy threats and uncertainty.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the former head of government, who is accused of ignoring the comprehensive economic plan drafted by Eesti 200 and various entrepreneurs. This criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the lack of strategic economic management in the past. While no direct intransigence is expressed, emphasis is placed on the importance of the ideas that have gained momentum under the new Minister of Economic Affairs.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the bill's proponents, questioning their faction's internal consistency and their fulfillment of work duties, citing previous absences from committee work. The opposition is procedural and centers on the integrity of the bill's implementation.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Finance, which proposed an inadequate 25% rise in thresholds, thereby increasing the administrative burden on Estonian businesses. The criticism is both policy-based and methodological, specifically challenging the ministry's calculations concerning the number of companies subject to mandatory auditing. Furthermore, the figures presented by Jaak Aab, Chairman of the Economic Affairs Committee, regarding turnover growth are also being criticized.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at previous governments, who are accused of fostering massive bureaucracy, making unfunded promises, and forcing the state to live on debt. This criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, and is being utilized to justify the current strict fiscal measures. Opposition is also aimed at the low value-added economic model and the inefficient digital state.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at those who questioned the thoroughness and speed of the nuclear energy working group's report, dismissing their concerns as unfounded. He points to the lack of confidence expressed by a Social Democrat colleague, but highlights that a minister from that very same party contributed to the report's security analysis. The opponents' arguments are thus regarded as both procedurally and substantively flawed.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at those who pit nuclear energy against other renewable sources, and those who bring up "far-fetched reasons" against nuclear power (e.g., the lack of specialists or suitable locations). The main objection is directed at the indecision that has caused economic harm to Estonia. The criticism is policy-based and procedural, not personal.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is directed at the Centre Party and EKRE, who are accused of initiating a vote of no confidence and attempting to torpedo the transition to Estonian-language education. The criticism is intense and substantive, further accusing opponents of accumulating previous problems within the education system and using "Russian talking points." Any extension of time for implementing the reforms is categorically rejected.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Culture and the current funding model, arguing that it fails to adequately value top-tier actors. The opposition is policy-driven, demanding a complete restructuring of the funding model.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at "senseless bureaucracy" that obstructs economic development and entrepreneurial activity. The green transition is also being criticized; it must not be "crazy" or diminish the competitiveness of businesses. The criticism is focused on state-level obstacles and inefficiency, rather than specific political opponents.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against the draft bill presented by the government due to its inadequate description of judicial procedure and the inclusion of provisions contrary to the constitution. The opposition is aimed at a situation where the Competition Authority imposes fines without full judicial review or without granting the individual a hearing. The criticism is strictly political and procedural.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government's economic policy, which entrepreneurs have been critically assessing for years. The criticism is policy-based, highlighting the government's inability to create a suitable economic environment for entrepreneurs. The intensity of the offensive is moderate, posing a question regarding feedback.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against those statements and viewpoints which assert that the air ambulance service cannot be reformed for economic (it is too expensive) or logistical reasons. The opposition is focused on the lack of seriousness regarding the reform and the prejudices that impede the development of the service.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism targets the state system and bureaucracy that has kept the air ambulance market closed and monopolized (via PPA helicopters). The objection is rooted in policy and procedure, citing inefficiency, a lack of development, and the state's prioritization of its own "convenience" over saving human lives. Furthermore, the alleged manipulation of the Health Board's budget, which obscures the actual cost of the service, is also under fire.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Opponents are neither criticized nor mentioned; the criticism is instead directed at the limited impact of the action (or statement).
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is broadly aimed at the results of state governance achieved by previous governments and all parties represented in the Riigikogu over the past few decades. Specific criticism is leveled against the overly zealous adoption of European Union directives and decisions that proved misguided. The criticism is policy-driven, and Eesti 200 distances itself from past errors, given that it has not participated in previous governments.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Specific political opponents are not named, but criticism is directed at those who prioritize short-sighted popularity and "easy political wins" over taking responsibility for the country's future. Aggressive Russia is cited as the external threat, which puts pressure on the budgets of European countries and necessitates fiscal strengthening.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at European Union member states or opposition groups that favor the idea of a Ukrainian buffer zone, which is considered a threat to European unity. The Hungarian Prime Minister is highlighted as a specific representative of this opposing stance. The criticism is policy- and values-based.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main opponent is the accuser who brought up the names of Eesti 200 and Lehtme on the floor of the Riigikogu. The criticism targets the opposing side's inaction and procedural irregularity, given that the alleged evidence is being withheld and not presented to the police. The intensity of the attack is high, including a direct warning that concealing the evidence could result in criminal charges.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed against a specific bill proposed by the Isamaa party, which is criticized for creating inequality relative to other professions and causing market distortions. The criticism is focused on policy and procedure, noting that the bill was too brief and lacked the necessary impact analysis. The committee proposed rejecting the bill (6 in favor, 1 against).
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed against the rhetoric of the government or the bill's supporters, who label non-supporters as "people hostile towards Estonia." The state policy that pays for the upkeep of red monuments and graves is also criticized.