By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Uibo

While direct opposition is not voiced, a policy-based challenge has been issued, requiring a comparison and justification for why the EKRE bill is superior to the similar Isamaa bill. The criticism targets the substantive effectiveness and clarity of the draft legislation, rather than individuals or procedures.

The criticism targets the state's unreliability as a private sector partner, citing as examples the public statements made by the Deputy Secretary General of the Ministry of Climate and the subsequent cancellation of the film campus project. The opposition (Mart Maastik) is also criticized for failing to grasp the subject matter (private funding) and for lacking constructive ideas, while emphasizing that this issue transcends partisan politics.

He/She opposes those forces that do not adhere to established law and organize information operations in front of the Riigikogu. On the international level, he/she calls into question Hungary’s decision to block sanctions against Patriarch Kirill, citing undesirable foreign policy conduct.

The criticism is aimed at Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and the conflicting signals given by the United States administration. There is no criticism of domestic opponents; the focus is on foreign policy threats and uncertainty.