By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Uibo

The political stance is heavily focused on supporting compensation for damages incurred by livestock farmers and regulating losses caused by predators. Emphasis is placed on the need to address a specific policy gap concerning compensation when an animal carcass cannot be located. Regulatory clarity regarding the legal grounds for culling wolves is also crucial. The political framework itself is primarily policy- and solution-driven.

The political position is firmly focused on treating sports and culture as an economic sector, highlighting their positive contribution to GDP. Support is given to finding smart solutions and engaging the private sector, given that public budget resources are constrained. This is a performance-based approach, underscoring the necessity for the state to be a reliable partner.

The political stance is sharply focused on national security and combating Russian influence operations. The speaker highlights the historical and ongoing ties between the Moscow Orthodox Church and Soviet security services (KGB/Cheka). He/She strongly supports sanctions against Patriarch Kirill and disputes claims that such sanctions undermine peace initiatives. The political framework is robustly value-based and highly sensitive to threats from a security perspective.

The political focus is heavily centered on foreign and security policy, highlighting Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine. The speaker voices concern over the conflicting signals emanating from the new United States administration and stresses the necessity of an independent European agenda for managing the crisis. This stance is value-based, underscoring Europe's responsibility in supporting Ukraine.