By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The political position is strongly opposed to the current implementation of the green agenda, which is being labeled a great fraud. The primary focus is on the availability of affordable energy and fair competition, prioritizing these above subsidized schemes. The stance is value-based, emphasizing injustice and the impoverishment of consumers.

The political focus is heavily centered on issues of energy security and electricity pricing, expressing strong opposition to the plan to construct 400 new wind turbines. The speaker questions the effectiveness of the current market structure, highlighting consumers' reliance on weather conditions and the enrichment of speculators on the electricity exchange. The stance is highly critical of the government's energy policy, which is framed as a system detrimental to consumers.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's economic policy (tax hikes) and social policy (the restriction of the Orthodox Church). The speaker demands tax reductions and affordable energy to stimulate the economy, and defends the principles of the rule of law against interference in the internal affairs of the church. The focus is thus placed both on the government's poor economic performance and on the value-based defense of religious freedom.

The political position is strongly oppositional to the government’s priorities, focusing on the unfair distribution of resources and state gigantism. The most critical issues are the underfunding of social needs and the termination of financing for large-scale projects of questionable value (Rail Baltic, wind farms). A new government and a new tax policy are demanded, which would ensure a dignified standard of living for all residents.

The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's actions and legitimacy. The speaker emphasizes that the government lacks a popular mandate due to its extremely low support (20%), asserting that power was obtained through electoral fraud and by breaking promises regarding taxes and security. The main demand is the resignation of the Prime Minister, arguing that such low support destroys democratic morale. This critique is based on performance and democratic accountability.

The political position is focused on the critical analysis and risk assessment of the Rail Baltic project. The speaker demands answers concerning the project's economic viability, military security, and the progress made by partner countries (Latvia, Poland). The stance expresses strong skepticism regarding the project's current execution and financial sustainability, centering on results-based criticism.

The political stance is strongly results-oriented and critical, focusing on government inefficiency and the control of administrative expenditures. The speaker sharply criticizes the policy document for lacking administrative cost reductions. The intensity of the criticism is underscored by citing Estonia's leading position in Europe regarding the number of officials per taxpayer.