By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The primary opposition is aimed at the government, criticizing the Ministry of Economic Affairs' priorities regarding demography and LGBT issues, and the Ministry of Justice's actions concerning the EU regulation on the right to protest. The criticism targets both political choices and the underestimation of risks.

The confrontation is aimed directly at the presenter, criticizing the scope or consequences of the policy they have put forward. The criticism is intense and provocative, employing an extreme example (the establishment of a sex tourism center) to discredit the opponent's stance.

No direct political confrontation is being expressed; the criticism is aimed instead at the state's inaction regarding the compensation and regulation of high prices. The criticism is policy- and results-based, not personal.

The confrontation is aimed at both the government minister (on the issue of healthcare funding) and the rapporteur/government coalition. The criticism is intense, encompassing political discord and culminating in a direct personal accusation of lying for distorting legislative facts. No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, the dishonesty of the opposing side is emphasized.

The speaker is in an opposition position, criticizing the government's actions in the context of the budget. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on whether the budget offers solutions for alleviating poverty.