By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The political position is fiercely critical of the government’s priorities, specifically regarding the demographic crisis and the promotion of LGBT issues, which are explicitly labeled as propaganda. The speaker emphasizes that the number of Estonians decreases by 5,000 every year, pointing to a value-based and crisis-focused framework. Concern is also expressed over the preservation of constitutional rights, such as the freedom of assembly, in connection with the new EU regulation on political advertising.

The speaker uses a provocative question to criticize a political direction that appears ready to legalize socially sensitive activities. The position is strongly critical of prioritizing money (revenue) over moral or social considerations, using an ironic reference to the legalization of prostitution. The political framework is value-based and contrasts with a purely pragmatic approach.

The political focus is currently on social inequality and the high cost of living, particularly food prices. The speaker urgently calls for state intervention to compensate those in need and regulate prices, citing the necessity of improving government performance. This stance is strongly focused on social protection and performance, emphasizing that wages and pensions are simply too low compared to current prices.

The political stance is sharply critical of the government's actions, focusing specifically on the lack of necessary funding to eliminate medical waiting lists and the failure to support lowering the VAT on food products. This framework is results-oriented and politically adversarial, emphasizing the opposition's earlier legislative proposals. The speaker urgently demands solutions to the healthcare funding crisis.

The speaker's primary focus is on poverty and citizens' financial insecurity, which they consider one of Estonia's most serious problems. The stance is highly socially sensitive and targets the accountability of government actions (specifically the budget), demanding concrete solutions. The framework adopted is results-based, focusing on the government's ability to solve the everyday problems faced by the populace.