By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The opposition is aimed at the decision-makers or those who made the proposal, who are allowing a newly established company to audit the National Audit Office. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the lack of credibility of the selected auditor.

The opposition's stance is strong and directed squarely against the government and the prime minister. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative consequences of the government's economic decisions (tax increases) and its inability to halt the decline in the standard of living. The attacks are intense, demanding concrete solutions and financial transparency.

The primary conflict is with the government’s position, which denies any link between financial resources and having children—a claim the speaker explicitly labels an outright lie. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the government’s inability to guarantee sufficient child benefits and the budget for school meals. Opponents are accused of lacking empathy, as they "most likely do not know what it means to raise children in poverty."

The standoff is directed at the government and the prime minister, criticizing their tax policy (the raising of VAT and corporate income tax). The criticism is policy-focused and intense, accusing the government of destroying the competitive advantage during the crisis.

The primary opponents are the Reform Party (held accountable for national economic policy) and the Social Democratic Party (held accountable for local ethics and financing). Criticism is intense, accusing the government of an economic catastrophe, and SDE members of conflicts of interest regarding school funding. No readiness to compromise is being expressed.

The criticism is directed at both the current electoral system and specific representatives who secured their mandates due to a high placement on the party list rather than through voters' actual votes. The backlash is intense, accusing them of lacking the public's trust and exploiting an unjust law, particularly if they have switched parties after obtaining the mandate.