By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The rhetorical style is formal and critical, employing logical argumentation grounded in factual data. Strong skepticism is conveyed via a direct rhetorical question, thereby challenging the credibility of the decision.

The style is formal, critical, and urgent, directed at the respected session chairman and the prime minister. The rhetoric relies heavily on logical and data-driven appeals, utilizing statistics (an 84% decline in purchasing power) and expert opinions to underscore the gravity of the situation. The tone is demanding, requiring the government to provide concrete plans and final cost breakdowns.

The rhetorical style is insistent, critical, and emotional, describing the situation as "the deepest demographic crisis" and "a catastrophe." Strong contrasts and personal challenges are directed at the presenter (e.g., "Could you yourself feed your child for 1 euro?") to highlight the inadequacy of the policy. The style balances statistics (price increases) with a moral appeal, referencing the plight of children living in poverty.

The rhetorical style is critical and direct, presenting the Prime Minister with a pointed question regarding the consequences of the government's policies. The tone is formal (using salutations such as 'Esteemed' or 'Honorable'), but the content is confrontational and centers on a logical argument concerning the loss of competitiveness.

The rhetorical style is sharp, aggressive, and demanding, employing strong and accusatory phrases such as "economic suicide" and "conflict of interest." The speaker presents fact-based claims (e.g., a 40% price increase over three years) and demands concrete plans and answers from the government to restore economic growth and halt the rise in prices.

The rhetorical style is formal, yet critical and direct, focusing on highlighting injustice and systemic flaws. The appeals are primarily logical and value-based, emphasizing constitutionality and the lack of voter confidence. The tone is accusatory towards those who received a mandate with a low vote count and subsequently switched parties.