By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The main opponent is "The Government," which is sharply criticized for financial incompetence and the errors that led to the supplementary budget. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, highlighting both cuts to social benefits and the closure of the rescue squad. The speaker categorically refuses to support the supplementary budget, arguing it was necessitated by the government's mistakes.

The confrontation targets the Prime Minister’s actions, criticizing the head of government for procedural irregularities and a lack of accountability regarding his participation in international meetings. The criticism is aimed at the government’s leadership style and its adherence to established norms.

The speaker is opposing the ongoing debate in the Riigikogu concerning Georgia's internal affairs, specifically criticizing the principle of intervention. The criticism is directed at the political procedure and the policy of interference, not at a personal level.

The confrontation is directed at the government (the minister) and the commission responsible for drafting and processing the supplementary budget. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the failure to account for economic growth and procedural deficiencies within the commission.

The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for the poor state of the national budget and for tax increases that burden the poor. The criticism is political and focuses on the government's fiscal policy choices and the commission's decision to approve the car tax while simultaneously rejecting the Centre Party faction's proposal for a bank tax.

The confrontation is aimed at the prime minister and the government, criticizing the lack of transparency and the assumption of responsibility regarding international commitments. The criticism is procedural and focuses on whether the prime minister informed the government about what was discussed and the commitments undertaken at the Bilderberg meeting.