By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s fiscal policy and the supplementary budget. The criticism is performance-based, focusing on the government’s financial incompetence, which is evidenced by ministries failing to utilize hundreds of millions of euros. The speaker frames the situation as a direct consequence of stagnation, poverty, and a lack of economic growth.

The political stance heavily emphasizes oversight of the government's activities and the Prime Minister's conduct during participation in international meetings. The speaker calls the Prime Minister's actions into question, highlighting the necessity for prior governmental consultation. The framework is results-oriented, focusing on the accountability of the head of government and adherence to procedural correctness.

The political stance heavily focuses on the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state (Georgia). The speaker questions the necessity of the discussion, emphasizing that if Georgia’s elections and government are legitimate, there is no basis for intervention. This position is value-based, stressing national legitimacy and sovereignty.

The political focus is centered on the supplementary budget and its impact on the national economy. The speaker adopts a critical and interrogative posture, calling into question the actions of the government (the minister) and the commission when assessing economic growth prospects. This is performance-based criticism, which focuses specifically on the government's capacity to achieve economic recovery.

The political position is vehemently opposed to the car tax, which is viewed as an assault on the wallets of the poorest citizens. The core issues are fiscal policy and state budget management, with emphasis placed on the necessity of finding alternative revenue streams by taxing large profits and wealth. The framework of this position is primarily results-oriented, focusing on the government's failure in budget management and its choice of regressive taxation.

The political position centers on scrutinizing the government’s activities and transparency, particularly concerning the Prime Minister’s international commitments (Bilderberg). Furthermore, there is interest in the current status of the major infrastructure project—the Tallinn Hospital project—which indicates concern over the progress of national development initiatives. The questions being posed are designed to assess the government's performance and accountability.