By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson

The speaker himself does not express opposition, but rather references the criticism of colleagues Kingo, Grünthal, and Solman regarding the content of the draft bill (outdated content, discrimination against men) and the increase in bureaucracy. He also conveys the ministry’s objections to the criticism, remaining a neutral intermediary.

The speaker himself did not express opposition but rather relayed concerns raised by colleagues (e.g., Lutsar, Joller, Kingo, Grünthal) and the Office of the Chancellor of Justice regarding the specifics of the draft bill. The opposition primarily focused on the bill's potential impacts (parents of children under three, kindergarten availability) and procedural issues (the authority to decide on raising the pension age). The Ministry presented clear counter-arguments to all concerns, demonstrating that they were actively seeking compromises.

The criticism is directed at the inaction of the previous, unnamed government, which did not prioritize the zero bureaucracy program. The criticism is policy-based and moderate in intensity, focusing on the lack of political continuity.