By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The criticism is indirect, reflecting the concern among committee members regarding the high price of biofuel and its impact on ticket prices, as well as the competitiveness of European Union air carriers compared to the Third World. Regarding procedural decisions, there was opposition within the committee (2 votes against the proposal to conclude the first reading and set the deadline for amendments).

The speeches lack direct criticism or confrontation with other political groups or policies.

The criticism is aimed at the shortcomings of the government's action plan, particularly regarding financial calculations and ensuring regional equality during the implementation of AI. This is policy-based criticism that demands accountability, but it does not attack direct opponents.

Insufficient Dataset

The criticism is aimed at a specific draft bill—the sustainability report—which, according to the speaker, has been heavily criticized for increasing the administrative burden. Indirect criticism is also leveled against the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, specifically questioning the number of criminals apprehended, given the high rate of crime.

Insufficient data. (The speaker is rather acknowledging the minister's previous overview ("good overview") and is not presenting criticism or opposition.)

The opposition is directed specifically at the draft law currently being discussed, concerning which the speaker notes widespread skepticism within the chamber. The criticism is based on both policy and substance, challenging the bill's adherence to the principles of free competition.