By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The style of cooperation is open and demanding, involving active communication with representatives of the Government of the Republic (Minister Sutt, Advisor Vöörmann) to obtain clarifications. The Commission demanded and received an additional impact analysis, which demonstrates a readiness for cooperation provided that the necessary information is submitted. Cooperation with Estonian aviation fuel suppliers is also noted.

The collaborative style is aimed at obtaining information and requesting projections from the minister, using a respectful and professional tone. This demonstrates a readiness for dialogue with the executive branch regarding the implementation of legislation.

Based on this data, conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the style of cooperation, since it involves a question submitted to the minister, which is more accurately described as a form of oversight and demanding accountability.

Insufficient data set.

The speaker emphasized the necessity of international cooperation to tackle cross-border organized crime (drug trafficking, cyber scams). Data regarding cooperation with domestic political parties or colleagues is unavailable.

Insufficient data. (Only formal communication with the minister is visible in the context of posing a question, which follows the minister's report.)

The speaker indirectly alluded to cooperation with other skeptical members of Parliament (Riigikogu), noting the widespread skepticism toward the draft bill voiced in the chamber. There is no information available regarding direct cooperation or the search for a compromise.