By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Tali

The standoff is indirectly aimed at the current defense procurement policy, which allows substantial amounts of money to flow abroad—a situation deemed regrettable. The criticism is policy-driven, highlighting the necessity of prioritizing Estonian manufacturing and addressing the resulting economic detriment.

The main opponent is the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, who is sharply criticized as a tool of Kremlin influence and a war instigator attempting to divide the Estonian population. Political opponents are criticized indirectly, specifically by accusing them of organizing a massive political attack aimed at thwarting the transition to unified Estonian-language education. A compromise regarding the Moscow church is ruled out, as it would be viewed as a sign of weakness.