By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Tali
Total Sessions: 41
Fully Profiled: 41
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism targets the political opposition, which has attempted to call into question the relevance and timing of the debate, citing their lack of strategic foresight. Furthermore, the discontent within the European Parliament (specifically the EPP and the Social Democrats) regarding the failure to increase agricultural subsidies is also noted.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Strong distrust and criticism are aimed squarely at the Centre Party, citing their three separate criminal convictions for political corruption. Opponents' scare tactics regarding the creation of a "surveillance society" are dismissed as baseless and Luddite. Furthermore, claims that the draft bill has not been sufficiently debated are also rejected.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is being sharply criticized for polarizing society and making unrealistic demands, especially regarding their desire to increase spending without making any changes to taxation. The speaker rejects the criticism leveled by the political opposition, accusing them of being unable to handle basic arithmetic or understand percentages. One specific party is directly criticized for seeking to sabotage the Rail Baltic project and wanting to exit the European Union, which is extremely unreasonable.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker rejects and sharply criticizes the charge concerning the slow pace of legislative work, labeling it completely inappropriate and unfounded. The criticism is aimed at those who question the speed of the National Defense Committee’s operations, though no specific opposing party or individual is named.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The criticism targets the Financial Supervision Authority's operational readiness and its failure to establish plans for a large-scale crisis situation. The opposition focuses on institutional preparedness, demanding concrete evidence that well-thought-out action plans are actually in place.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
No direct criticism is leveled against opponents, but the speaker does indirectly point out the deficiencies of earlier proposals. Previous legislative attempts are deemed inferior to the current draft bill, though the criticism is not aimed at specific individuals or groups.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia, which is treated as a hostile organization and a subcontractor for the Kremlin’s special services. The criticism is fundamental, political, and moral, accusing the adversaries of dividing the population and attacking the free Estonian state with brutal lies. Compromise with the Moscow leadership is ruled out, as their relationship of subservience to the Kremlin is abnormal and dangerous.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary disagreement is aimed at the pessimism voiced by Mr. Arkhipov, who deemed certain goals impossible. The politician criticizes this attitude, refuting it with historical examples, but immediately follows up by proposing cooperation to find solutions. The criticism is not personal; rather, it targets the idea of incapacity or inability to act.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed both at international lobbyists ("representatives of exotic countries") and at domestic political opponents who underestimate the security situation. Mr. Grünthal's skepticism and Varro Vooglaid's assertion regarding Putin's balanced approach are particularly sharply rejected, with Putin being labeled a war criminal. The criticism is politically and fundamentally intense, precluding any compromise on security matters.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He/She sharply criticizes opposition politicians and skeptics who suggest rethinking the education reform or "wavering," insisting instead on consistent progress. He/She expresses strong opposition to state funding for political parties convicted of corruption. He/She identifies the Russian-language information space and "creeping bilingualism" as threats that divide society and foster segregation.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at those who are unfair to Raul Rebane, and those who introduce dishonest arguments with hidden agendas during the debates surrounding the Law on Congregations and Churches. He expresses intense opposition to certain rhetoric, drawing a sharp, implicit comparison between Varro Vooglaid and Dmitry Peskov. He does not believe in the sincerity of his opponents ("crocodile tears").
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversary is the eastern neighbor, who is regarded as a source of hybrid pressure and to whom a clear resolve must be demonstrated, both in word and deed. No direct criticism is leveled at domestic political opponents. The speaker instead reassures his colleague (Raimond Kaljulaid) regarding the progress of the governing coalition's work.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the church operating under the Moscow Patriarchate, which is viewed as a tool for hostile influence operations. Criticism is also aimed at Bishop Margo Lepisk and Russian influence agents, who are accused of anti-Estonian state activities and false piety. The speaker rules out seeking any compromise, arguing that imperialists would interpret it as weakness.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Russian Federation and Belarus as aggressor states that are shattering the peace of the free world. He sharply criticizes the Moscow church, calling it a subcontractor for the special services, and promises to support its eradication from Estonia. He opposes the participation of Russian and Belarusian citizens, as well as unintegrated persons, in local elections.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is aimed at the party that filed the motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister. The criticism is intense and centers on the opposing side's past criminal corruption, accusing them of hypocrisy since they themselves have been "criminally penalized for corruption three times."
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The primary adversary is Russia and the Putin regime, which is fiercely criticized for its imperialistic ambitions and the occupation of Georgia. The criticism is strategic and value-driven, highlighting that Russia is achieving its strategic objective. The intensity of the offensive is high, focusing on Russia's long-term threats.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are EKRE and the Centre Party, whose criticism of the budget is seen as predictable and nothing more than baseless whining. The criticism is intense and politically charged, pointing to the opposition's negative worldview, which ignores Estonia's historically high standard of living.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is directed at those who spread disinformation about the missions and confuse the facts (e.g., Ukraine, Iraq, Syria). The most intense criticism is leveled at Mart Helme and "The Helme Family." This criticism is value-based, fiercely refuting the accusation that Estonian soldiers are mercenaries. Criticism is also aimed at the indecisiveness of the UN Security Council.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the voting rights of citizens of aggressor states (Russia, Belarus), viewing this as a security threat that could potentially influence the selection of the highest leader of national defense. It also takes a stand against those who question the necessity of amending the constitution when it has become "outdated." Furthermore, it indirectly criticizes those who fail to grasp the objective of the Estonian soldiers' mission, rejecting the "Porthos principle" (I fight because I fight).
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The confrontation is intense and principled, aimed primarily at Russia's aggression and the regime of dictator Putin, who is referred to as being accused of war crimes. The speaker strongly criticizes the Hungarian government's pro-Kremlin stance and its presidency, expressing disappointment directly in the Hungarian parliament. He also rejects Mart Helme's views on the war in Ukraine as "completely inappropriate," opposing any talk of [Ukraine] becoming a Russian oblast.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main adversary is the Orthodox Church operating under the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate, which is sharply criticized as a hostile organization and a tool of Kremlin influence. The criticism is ideological and security-based, demanding that its activities be terminated. Furthermore, loud disagreement is being voiced with the Minister of Internal Affairs regarding the necessity of a long-term plan, citing impatience and a desire to act more quickly.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is mainly aimed at procedural shortcomings, specifically criticizing Mr. Aller (SDE) for failing to submit his proposed amendments on time. In terms of foreign policy, there is strong opposition to Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán, who is being called a "Kremlin chatbot" for obstructing sanctions. Russia and Belarus are treated as authoritarian aggressor states, and all business dealings with them must cease.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Opposition criticism is aimed at the political opposition, who proposed suspending the sitting, and specifically targets Priit Sibul and the Isamaa party. The criticism is intense and focuses on the opponents' feckless behavior and their lack of responsibility during the technical malfunction.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The primary confrontation is directed against the cyber and special services of authoritarian regimes (Russia, China, Iran), which are considered constant aggressors against the Western way of life. The speaker strongly warns of the threat posed by foreign interference and the spread of disinformation. Criticism of the domestic political opposition is not present in the speeches.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is aimed at the lack of consensus within the political system regarding decisive tax increases or spending cuts, which in turn impedes the financing of national defense. The opposition is both policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the absence of solutions concerning the balance of the state budget.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The standoff is indirectly aimed at the current defense procurement policy, which allows substantial amounts of money to flow abroad—a situation deemed regrettable. The criticism is policy-driven, highlighting the necessity of prioritizing Estonian manufacturing and addressing the resulting economic detriment.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, who is sharply criticized as a tool of Kremlin influence and a war instigator attempting to divide the Estonian population. Political opponents are criticized indirectly, specifically by accusing them of organizing a massive political attack aimed at thwarting the transition to unified Estonian-language education. A compromise regarding the Moscow church is ruled out, as it would be viewed as a sign of weakness.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the previous speaker, whose factual claims concerning the presence of the Russian language on government websites are being called into question, citing the correction made by faction colleague Mr. Kok, using the Ministry of Defence as an example. The criticism is intense and focuses on the opponent's lack of credibility when verifying facts.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the policy of the government (or the responsible minister) that appears to prioritize bringing in foreign skilled labor. The opposition is rooted in policy and priorities, challenging the rationale behind the current course of action.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
Criticism is directed at the use of obstructionist procedural tactics, which burdened the plenary sessions, referencing the mass amendments submitted by the EKRE faction. The confrontation is primarily procedural, rather than substantive, although there were disagreements with EKRE representatives regarding the voting requirement.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speech contains no opposition or criticism directed at other political forces or groups. The focus is on substantiating the necessity and urgency of the draft bill.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary party being criticized is the Russian Federation and its legal system (the Kremlin, Russian courts), which is widely regarded as authoritarian, untrustworthy, and biased. The criticism is fundamental and value-based, highlighting Russia’s consistent violation of international agreements and its blatant disregard for the rule of law. The speaker rules out any possibility of trust in Russia.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary adversary is Russia, whose actions in Ukraine are being criticized extremely intensely in the context of war crimes and casualties. The criticism is directed at the state's actions and morality, citing the deportation of children as a perverse idea.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary resistance is directed at Russia as the aggressor, who must be punished through both a war crimes tribunal and the confiscation of assets. Indirect criticism is aimed at the allies who have failed to fulfill their promise to supply Ukraine with one million shells, underscoring the necessity of overcoming these obstacles.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No direct opposition is voiced, but there is an indirect criticism of the current situation or system that prevents innovative solutions from quickly reaching the armed forces' inventory. The criticism is aimed at procedural inertia, which keeps the weaponry "stuck in the 19th century."
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary adversary is the Tallinn City Government, which stands accused of insufficient support for education and the deliberate obstruction of the transition to Estonian-language schooling. The criticism is intense, suggesting political sabotage rather than mere political disagreement. The resistance is strong and uncompromising.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the member of the Riigikogu who displays symbols of occupation, and at the EKRE representative who allegedly denied Russia’s aggression in Ukraine in 2019. The criticism is intense and is based on values and moral considerations, rather than being primarily political.