By Agendas: Peeter Tali

Total Agendas: 50

Fully Profiled: 50

2025-10-15
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the political opposition, which attempted to call into question the relevance and timing of the debate, arguing that it was premature. The criticism is both procedural and strategic, stressing that early, proactive measures are necessary to prevent painful consequences down the line.
2025-10-08
Third reading of the Draft Act supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opposition and distrust are aimed at the Centre Party, which is criticized for having received a triple criminal conviction for political corruption. Opponents, in turn, are accused of inciting fear regarding the topic of a surveillance society and lodging baseless procedural complaints about a lack of transparency.
2025-09-25
Political statement by Prime Minister Kristen Michal regarding the transfer of the draft State Budget Act 2026

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The criticism directed at the opposition is sharp, accusing them of polarizing society and presenting unrealistic demands (such as increasing spending while simultaneously refusing to change taxes). Specific criticism is leveled against the party that seeks to dismantle Rail Baltic and withdraw from the European Union, viewing this as extremely unreasonable and contrary to the interests of the Estonian people. Michal further accuses the political opposition of lacking basic numeracy skills.
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu ("Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the internationally binding obligations of the Republic of Estonia on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization mission in Iraq") (708 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

Insufficient data
2025-09-17
Second reading of the draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker rejects the general accusation regarding the Riigikogu's sluggishness in legislation, labeling it inappropriate and unwarranted. They cite the processing of other bills (620, 631, 659) as evidence of the Riigikogu's speed. No direct political opponent or parliamentary faction is criticized; instead, the focus is on addressing procedural criticism.
2025-09-11
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report

15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting

There is no direct confrontation, but the criticism is aimed at the Financial Supervision Authority regarding its potentially insufficient crisis preparedness. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing specifically on operational planning and due consideration.
2025-09-10
Draft law amending the Defence Service Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (664 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The criticism is indirectly aimed at previous legislative attempts, which are considered inferior and imperfect compared to the current bill. Specific opponents, political groups, or individuals are neither named nor criticized.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) - Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the Moscow Patriarchate (MP) and its Estonian organization, which is criticized not for religious belief, but for political subordination and hostile influence activities. The criticism is intense and security-based, accusing the MP of operating as part of the Kremlin regime's vertical of power and dividing the Estonian population. Opponents (Bishop Daniel) are accused of attacking the Estonian state abroad with "brutal lies."
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE) - first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

Speaker B directly criticizes Mr. Arkhipov, who had asserted that "some things are impossible," thereby challenging his pessimistic stance. The critique focuses on the opposing side's general attitude and their evaluation of feasibility, rather than the actual content of the policy.
2025-06-04
Draft law (642 SE) on the withdrawal from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Strong opposition is aimed at the Russian regime, and Putin is named the perpetrator of a crime of aggression who ought to face trial at the International Court in The Hague. Domestically, critics are targeting Mr. Grünthal’s skepticism and Varro Vooglaid’s stance on Putin’s “balanced approach.” Opposition is also directed at those who seek to make the withdrawal from the convention “softer.”
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are political parties convicted of corruption and opposition politicians who are hesitant about the transition to Estonian-language education. The criticism is intense and value-driven, accusing opponents of dividing society, encouraging segregation, and allowing the influence of the Russian information space. Compromise is ruled out, with emphasis placed on the fact that politicians must not "waver" or begin rethinking the reforms.
2025-05-14
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu concerning the appointment of members of the Estonian National Broadcasting Council from recognised experts in the field of activity of the Estonian National Broadcasting. (643 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at those who are against Rebane, who is being protected from injustice, and more broadly, at the politicians who took part in the debate over the church law. The criticism is sharp and personal, accusing opponents of dishonesty, hidden agendas, and shedding crocodile tears. Varro Vooglaid is mentioned in a critical and comparative context.
2025-04-09
Third reading of the draft law amending the Defence Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (Strengthening Maritime Security) (565 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker addresses colleague Raimond Kaljulaid directly, who has apparently voiced concerns about the lack of clarity regarding the coalition agreement and future plans. The disagreement is handled conciliatorily, promising comprehensive and clear answers concerning the coalition agreement within a couple of months.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main adversary is the Moscow church and its leadership, who are referred to as bearers of hostile influence activities and Kremlin stooges. Criticism is also directed at the Russian agents of influence present in the hall and Bishop Margo Lepisk, who refuses to sever ties with the aggressor church. The opposition is existential and political, where compromise is categorically ruled out, as it is considered weakness.
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is insufficient data.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed against Russia as an aggressor state and against the Kremlin’s influence operations, which utilize its citizens and non-citizens on the geopolitical chessboard. The Moscow Church is treated directly as an instrument of the Russian special services, with which there is nothing to discuss. Direct political opponents are not attacked personally; instead, the need to find common ground is emphasized.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The stance taken toward the opposition is extremely critical and condemnatory. Opponents are being attacked due to their previous convictions for criminal corruption, and they are being branded hypocrites for attempting to pass a vote of no confidence in the prime minister. The attack is intense and moral, not merely political.
2025-01-22
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "In Support of the People of Georgia" (564 AE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The primary adversary is the Russian Federation and the Putin regime, which is heavily criticized for its imperialistic ambitions and the military invasion of Georgia. The regime's aim to restore the Russian Empire is viewed as a threat to freedom-loving nations. While there is no direct criticism aimed at domestic opponents, the practical value of adopting the statement is being called into question.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are EKRE and the Centre Party, whose criticism is considered both expected and inadequate. The speaker dismisses the opponents' claims about a poor standard of living, stressing that the Estonian people have never lived as well as they do now. The criticism is more descriptive ("whining and wailing") than politically detailed.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution (486 OE) of the Riigikogu regarding the extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a post-conflict peacekeeping operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at Mart Helme and his assertion that Estonian soldiers are mercenaries, which the speaker considers an insult to their honor and personally offensive. The criticism is intense and value-driven, stressing that soldiers serve the nation and the state, not money. US President Joe Biden is also criticized for the poor management of the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu ("Extension of the period of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization mission in Iraq") (478 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is a complete absence of criticism or opposition; the speaker notes that not a single amendment was submitted regarding the draft bill. On the contrary, it is emphasized that the National Defence Committee approved the bill by consensus, citing the lack of opposition.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in the performance of Estonia's international obligations in an international military operation Inherent Resolve" (477 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Opponents are being criticized for creating confusion regarding the geographical scope of the operation by introducing irrelevant topics such as Ukraine and Syria. Another speaker sharply refuted the implicit accusations of violating international law, stressing that the Estonian soldier always fights for Estonian interests. The criticism is aimed at the distortion of facts and the lack of political clarity.
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the first contribution thereto."

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at Mr. Vooglaid, whose positions regarding the objectives of military operations are being directly refuted. The criticism is substantive and value-based, stressing that Estonian soldiers always fight for Estonia and its allied relations, not merely for the sake of fighting. The speaker defends the competence of the Riigikogu and the National Defence Committee, as well as the procedure that was utilized.
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (Parliament) entitled "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization mission in Iraq" (478 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at political opponents, but the speaker expresses frustration regarding the deviation from the main focus of the topic (the mention of Syria). The criticism is instead directed against the introduction of inaccurate facts or irrelevant subjects into the debate.
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in the performance of Estonia's international obligations in an international military operation Inherent Resolve" (477 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is minimal and is directed solely at Mr. Poolamets's rhetorical question, which is answered with a historical reference. There is an absence of intense political criticism or attacks against the political stances of opposing parties or groups concerning the draft bill.
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The main targets of criticism are the Hungarian government and its pro-Kremlin stance, which is viewed as a threat to European unity, and regarding which frank disappointment was voiced directly in Budapest. Domestically, Mart Helme faced sharp criticism for his views on the war in Ukraine and Estonian security, with his statements being labeled "inappropriate" and "foolishness." The criticism is overwhelmingly rooted in values and security policy.
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Orthodox Church operating in Estonia under the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate, which is sharply criticized as a tool of influence for a hostile state. The criticism is intense and ideological, emphasizing that this organization must be immediately terminated in Estonia. The Minister of the Interior is also indirectly criticized for the lack of a long-term strategy.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Penal Code and other laws in consequence thereof (offence-based sanctions) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at Hungary and Viktor Orbán, who is referred to as the "Kremlin talking points bot" for actively obstructing sanction packages. Russia and Belarus are viewed as authoritarian aggressor states whose business dealings corrupt businessmen, officials, and politicians, thereby undermining the rule of law.
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government’s priorities regarding the implementation of the public transport reform, specifically criticizing the decision to route the railway construction towards Haapsalu instead of Pärnu. This criticism is policy- and strategy-based, placing the achievement of Rail Baltic’s goals under scrutiny.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (426 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at those who try to politically exploit national defense and engage in populism. Specific criticism was leveled against Mr. Aller, who did not participate when the amendments were being drafted, citing procedural irregularities. The speaker rejects the criticism regarding the poor quality of the work done by the National Defense Committee.
2024-09-18
Second Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (426 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the political opposition and the Isamaa party, who are being criticized for descending into helplessness and proposing to suspend the session during a technical malfunction. He expresses personal disappointment with his colleague Priit Sibul regarding their response to the situation. The criticism is intense and centers on the opponents' incompetence during a crisis.
2024-09-11
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Financial Supervision Authority Act and Other Acts (422 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary confrontation is aimed at cyberattacks launched by authoritarian regimes and their special services (Russia, China, Iran), which are viewed as a continuous threat to the Western way of life. While no direct criticism is leveled at domestic political opponents, Minister Liisa Pakosta is urged to show "courage" in developing cyber defense, indicating a need for stronger political will.
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the overly narrow focus of the Minister of Defense (or the Ministry), which concentrates solely on traditional military defense (the role traditionally held by the Minister of the Armed Forces). The speaker demands that the Defense Minister actively address broader security threats, such as cyberattacks and foreign state interference. The criticism is policy-based and has been framed in the form of a question.
2024-06-13
Bank of Estonia 2023 Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

There is no direct opposition, but there is indirect criticism of the political inability to reach consensus on the financing of national defense expenditures. It is emphasized that consensus is lacking both for tax increases and for significant spending cuts.
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The criticism is directed at the current national procurement policy, which allows defense budget funds (1.6 billion euros) to flow to foreign suppliers (France, Spain, Germany). A challenge is also being presented to the government and the representative (whose clients are governments) to find solutions for securing the necessary money required to purchase munitions.
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation is directed against the political forces that submitted the motion of no confidence, who are accused of attempting to derail the process. The criticism is intense and focuses on political tactics aimed at thwarting the education reform or negotiating special conditions. The speaker views the opponents' goal as throwing things off balance.
2024-05-06
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Statement of the Riigikogu "On declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an institution supporting the military aggression of the Russian Federation" (Bill 420 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main adversary is the Moscow Patriarchate, which is sharply criticized on political and security grounds and labeled a subcontractor for the Kremlin's special services. The opposition is absolute, demanding the immediate termination of the organization's activities in Estonia. Criticism is also extended to Patriarch Kirill, who is directly associated with the KGB/FSB and who incites a religious war against the West.
2024-04-18
Discussion of the matter of significant national importance, initiated by the Environmental Committee, titled "The necessity and possibilities of introducing nuclear energy in Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

There is too little data.
2024-04-10
First reading of the Draft Resolution (365 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning the resolution titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Eliminate the Russian-Language Versions of the Websites of Ministries and Other Government Agencies."

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is the bill's rapporteur, whose credibility and fact-checking are being intensely criticized. The criticism is both procedural and fact-based, pointing to the inaccuracy of the claim that all websites are in Russian.
2024-04-10
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Defence League Act and the Amendment of Other Acts Related Thereto (Bill 335 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker pushes back against the previous speakers' possible overemphasis on the difficulty of the work. He asserts that the job of parliament is precisely discussion and finding compromise, not being a "rubber stamp."
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition targets the government's policy focusing on foreign skilled labor. The criticism is policy-based, questioning the priorities that come at the expense of retraining the domestic workforce.
2024-03-13
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (322 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare a Comprehensive National Defence Development Vision Extending up to the Year 2045 and a New Extraordinary National Defence Development Plan Deriving from It, Extending up to the Year 2034"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is directed at the procedural obstruction caused by the EKRE faction, which overloaded the order of business and prevented the draft legislation from moving forward. It is noted that EKRE initially filed 50 obstructionist amendments, which were subsequently withdrawn. Furthermore, a disagreement with EKRE representative Leo Kunnas regarding the requirement for a vote is mentioned, which was ultimately resolved by consensus.
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
2024-02-21
First Reading of the Draft Law on the Denunciation of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family, and Criminal Matters (362 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the Russian Federation, which is described as an authoritarian, dishonest state with imperial interests that "scoffs at our adherence to the rule of law." The criticism is intense and value-based, focusing on the lack of independence of the RF judicial system and the violation of treaties (e.g., the Budapest Memorandum, and the failure to respond to requests for legal assistance). Compromise is ruled out entirely, as there is a complete lack of trust in the RF.
2024-02-20
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "On the Return to Ukraine of Children Deported by Russia" (375 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the Russian Federation, whose actions in Ukraine (the forced deportation of children) are subject to extremely intense and substantive criticism, with these actions being labeled a unique war crime of the 21st century.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The direct opposition is aimed at Russia as the aggressor, who must be punished through the confiscation of assets and a war crimes tribunal. Criticism is also directed at the inefficiency of allies and partners in delivering the promised military aid (munitions), which jeopardizes Ukraine's capacity for resistance.
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Direct political opponents are not criticized, but there is indirect criticism regarding the sluggishness of the current situation, symbolized by the necessity of "getting out of the 19th century." The primary focus is on an external, numerically superior adversary, who must be defeated through technology.
2024-01-18
Debate on the National Issue of Crucial Importance: "Strong Rural Schools and a Strong School Network"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Tallinn City Government, which stands accused of insufficient support for education and actively hindering the transition to Estonian-language instruction. The criticism is intense, pointing toward political manipulation, exemplified by the deployment of an "Italian-style strike."
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are members of the Riigikogu who display symbols of the occupation regime, and the EKRE representative who denied Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. The criticism is intense and is aimed both at the lack of value-based conduct and the outright denial of facts.