By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The subject strongly supports a profit-oriented economy, viewing profit as the foundation for innovation, science, and culture, while also emphasizing that beauty will save the world. He/She sharply criticizes entrepreneurs who use circular economy slogans to eliminate competitors and maximize their own profits through legislation. Furthermore, he/she disputes the definition of fossil fuel subsidization.

There is not enough data.

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and realistic budget forecasts, criticizing the negative impact of excise tax increases on border trade and tax revenues. They support the reprioritization of expenditures toward strategic, value-adding activities (such as nuclear energy development) instead of inefficient spending, while criticizing the funneling of state budget funds to construction and electricity companies under the guise of tertiary education.

The individual/group advocates for strict fiscal discipline and the stabilization of state finances, opposing the current expansion of the budget deficit and the growing debt burden. They demand cost cutting, specifically targeting public relations departments and "unproductive" activities (such as environmental footprint assessments), in order to improve the nation's budgetary position. Furthermore, they criticize the government's actions, which have resulted in a sharp increase in housing and food prices.

Economic perspectives emphasize the importance of affordable energy and advocate for fossil fuels and nuclear power. Criticism is leveled at the high costs of renewable energy, which result from taxes and grid tariffs, as well as the administratively imposed CO2 emissions trading scheme. The preference is for energy production that is competitive without administrative restrictions.

The speaker is vehemently opposed to tax hikes, especially those targeting struggling families and property-based taxes (land tax). They criticize the government's policy, which increases the costs for local municipalities (KOV) while simultaneously forcing real estate "into circulation" through high taxation, a measure particularly detrimental to farmers. The speaker attributes the rise in land prices to money printing and subsidies for renewable energy development, maintaining skepticism regarding the green transition.

Economic perspectives center on tax policy, expressing strong criticism of the proposed vehicle tax. A clear justification is demanded regarding how this tax will advance the Estonian economy, given the existing skepticism about its utility. The primary focus remains on the overall national tax burden and its resulting impact.

Economic perspectives emphasize the importance of maintaining competitiveness in Europe and Estonia. There is opposition to policies that prioritize wind and solar energy if doing so harms economic stability and results in a loss of competitiveness.

Economic views strongly emphasize the critical role that competitive electricity pricing plays in ensuring the overall competitiveness of industry and the economy. The speaker is concerned about the negative impact of high energy prices and is calling on the government to move toward a more competitive direction.

Economic perspectives are highly critical of the government's fiscal policy, emphasizing the vigorous growth of both the budget deficit and the debt burden. Concerns are voiced regarding government measures that are stifling economic sectors, and questions are being raised about the inconsistency of policy when regulating different sectors.