By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

It refers to active participation in both plenary sessions (where he spoke about the substance during the second reading) and in the work of the committees (the Environment Committee and the Economic Affairs Committee). He focuses on critical bills toward the end of the session, using the time to persuade coalition members of parliament.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session debate, asking questions regarding the handling of the draft bill and the level of political support. They note that this is their first term in the Riigikogu (Parliament), which suggests relatively fresh political experience.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session, posing both procedural questions to the presiding officer and substantive, pointed questions to the rapporteur. This behavior demonstrates a readiness to intervene and demand clarity regarding both the procedural rules (the question-and-answer round) and the content of the draft legislation.

All speeches were delivered on a single day of the plenary session, June 16, 2025, which demonstrates active participation in the question period and debates. The speaker addresses questions to both ministers and rapporteurs, focusing on a wide range of topics, from the economy to security.

Actively participates in the work of the Riigikogu, speaking at plenary sessions and taking part in committee work, including the recent field trip to the Sopi-Tootsi wind farm. He/She refers to frequent private conversations with colleagues where the existence of problems is acknowledged. He/She is involved in presenting draft legislation and publicly filing complaints.

The action pattern indicates active participation in the Riigikogu Q&A session, where a specific question is posed, immediately followed by a supplementary question containing procedural criticism. This points to a pattern where the speaker maximizes the allotted time for both exerting substantive pressure and engaging in procedural opposition.