By Months: Kadri Tali

The criticism is aimed at those who frighten people with the collapse of the economy and view culture as a mere side hobby, as well as those who repeat the cynical mantra about culture being well-funded (2% of GDP). Particularly strong disappointment is expressed toward the members of Isamaa, who promised to support the initiative in writing but then backed out, citing an egregious contradiction between their words and their actions.

While direct confrontation is avoided, strong critical and cautious views are being voiced concerning the provisions of the draft Song and Dance Celebration Act, which are seen as potentially overly prescriptive or artistically restrictive. The criticism targets the substance of the draft, rather than its initiator (the Isamaa faction), and stress is laid on the point that the law must not turn into a mere set of mandates. Attention is also drawn to the concerns raised by the Ministry of Education and Research and the Ministry of Finance regarding the lack of legal clarity surrounding the proposed tax law amendment.

Direct criticism is aimed at the current national funding model, which has failed to keep pace with inflation and has left the sector without the necessary conditions for development. The criticism is policy-based, highlighting the mistaken belief that culture is well-funded and emphasizing a focus on distribution rather than development. Specific political opponents are not criticized by name.

There are no direct opponents, but the general political behavior is criticized, manifesting as populism and a lack of accountability for one's own words. They also criticize the squabbling over the public purse at a time when bold decisions are required. The speaker also faults the political system for failing to value professionals in their respective fields.