By Months: Kristina Šmigun-Vähi

A confrontational attitude is completely absent; the speaker emphasizes that all the committee's procedural decisions were consensus-based. No criticism is leveled at the government, ministries, or other members of the Riigikogu.

The criticism is primarily aimed at the inefficient administrative system, where agencies fail to take responsibility and simply point fingers at one another. The objection is procedural and calls for system improvement through the designation of accountable parties and the use of fines. Specific political opponents are not being attacked; rather, the focus is on bureaucratic inertia.

There is no direct confrontation with specific political forces. The criticism is aimed at excessive bureaucracy and obligations that are deemed pointless and which people wish to postpone. The criticism is policy-based and directed at the regulatory burden.

There are no direct confrontations or criticism aimed at specific opponents. The Ministry of Finance is mentioned only in relation to the technical differences between the drafts and the timeline, and not for the purpose of criticism.

There is no direct opposition or criticism. The speaker does challenge the presenter's claims regarding energy neutrality and pollution from the nuclear power plant, but they do so to seek clarification, not aggressively.

The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education and Research, which is accused of failing to prioritize children's physical and mental health and failing to provide clear guidelines to schools. Schools are also criticized for restricting movement during breaks out of fear of accidents, to which the speaker responds, "Accidents happen to those who are active!" The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.