By Months: Kristina Šmigun-Vähi

Total Months: 14

Fully Profiled: 14

10.2025

4 Speeches

The criticism is primarily aimed at the inefficient administrative system, where agencies fail to take responsibility and simply point fingers at one another. The objection is procedural and calls for system improvement through the designation of accountable parties and the use of fines. Specific political opponents are not being attacked; rather, the focus is on bureaucratic inertia.
06.2025

4 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation with specific political forces. The criticism is aimed at excessive bureaucracy and obligations that are deemed pointless and which people wish to postpone. The criticism is policy-based and directed at the regulatory burden.
05.2025

3 Speeches

There are no direct confrontations or criticism aimed at specific opponents. The Ministry of Finance is mentioned only in relation to the technical differences between the drafts and the timeline, and not for the purpose of criticism.
04.2025

4 Speeches

There is no direct opposition or criticism. The speaker does challenge the presenter's claims regarding energy neutrality and pollution from the nuclear power plant, but they do so to seek clarification, not aggressively.
02.2025

2 Speeches

The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education and Research, which is accused of failing to prioritize children's physical and mental health and failing to provide clear guidelines to schools. Schools are also criticized for restricting movement during breaks out of fear of accidents, to which the speaker responds, "Accidents happen to those who are active!" The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
12.2024

1 Speeches

There is no opposition, as the speaker emphasizes that neither members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), nor factions, nor other committees submitted any amendments to the bill. Criticism towards political opponents is not presented; instead, the focus is on the consensus prevailing in the parliament. A compromise was possible and was achieved through consensus.
10.2024

5 Speeches

There is no opposition; the presenter neutrally addresses questions raised by committee members and the plenary concerning the details of the draft bill (e.g., the steep increase in fine rates or supervision). No criticism is offered; rather, official explanations are provided.
09.2024

1 Speeches

Not enough data.
06.2024

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the existing bureaucracy and slow procedures, which impede foreign investment and harm Estonia's reputation. No direct political opponent is criticized; instead, the focus is on systemic shortcomings that cause foreign companies a real headache.
05.2024

3 Speeches

The speaker expresses clear opposition to the Center Party's initiative, representing the stance of the Reform Party faction. Furthermore, he criticizes the inefficiency of the former umbrella sports organizations (the Estonian School Sports Union and the Eestimaa Sports Union Jõud) in engaging inactive children, as well as the inefficiency of maintaining two separate organizations given the current economic situation.
04.2024

4 Speeches

The text lacks direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific political opponents or groups. Instead, the criticism is directed toward an undesirable situation—namely, the growing trend of overweight children—and the unclear division of responsibility among government agencies, demanding clarification regarding who holds the primary responsibility.
03.2024

3 Speeches

Direct opponents or political groupings are not criticized. The criticism is aimed at the current situation (high electricity prices, slow energy development) and the system's shortcomings, which neither motivate people nor offer quick solutions.
02.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
01.2024

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at a broader social trend where children and parents demand excessive rights, leading to the raising of a "coddled generation" and the intimidation of teachers. Specific political opponents or groups are not named; rather, the critique targets a cultural tendency that fails to value hard work.