By Plenary Sessions: Margit Sutrop

There is too little data.

Not enough data.

The primary criticism is leveled against the EKRE parliamentary group, accusing them of procedural obstruction by submitting 50 contradictory amendments, which forced the committee to hold repeated votes. EKRE's categorical approach to the language question in their draft bill is also under fire; specifically, the elimination of Russian-language websites for ministries is deemed both unnecessary and senseless. The critique targets both the substance of the policy and the procedural conduct.