By Plenary Sessions: Margit Sutrop

The style is formal and respectful, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the presenter ("Thank you very much for this substantive summary!"). The rhetoric is analytical and focused on questions, attempting to clarify the commission's methodology for weighing values, especially the relationship between security and energy.

The style is very formal and respectful, beginning with sincere thanks for the hard work of the minister and the ministry ("thank you very much for this great work"). The speaker employs logical argumentation, comparing the proportions of research funding (humanities versus natural sciences), and presents their concern in the form of a question.

The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, especially when conveying the details of the committee proceedings, where dates and voting results are emphasized. Logical appeals and data (e.g., funding amounts and coefficient percentages) are used to support the arguments. In the discussion of language policy, the tone is dignified, emphasizing the status of the state language, but at the same time, a reasonable and needs-based approach is sought.