By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is accused of undermining the livelihood of families and disregarding population policy. The criticism operates on both a policy level (cuts, car tax) and a personal level (the Minister's perceived arrogance and unwillingness to tolerate criticism). The government's actions are being labeled as inadequate, short-sighted, and frankly, detrimental.

The primary opponent is the Minister of the Interior, who is being sharply criticized for his past positions (opposition to Estonian-language instruction and the seizure of weapons) and for his current political motivation (chasing votes). The criticism is both policy-based and personal, accusing the minister of having unstable stances that are not rooted in security assessments.

The criticism is aimed at the state's inability to integrate the immigrant population and the parliament's failure to reach a consensus necessary for passing the required legislation. Indirectly, the criticism is also leveled against those decision-making bodies that have been unable to prevent pro-Kremlin manifestations and influence operations, drawing a contrast between Estonia and Latvia.

The main opponent is the Eesti 200 party and its leading figures (Margus Tsahkna, Kristina Kallas, Tiit Riisalo, the Speaker of the Riigikogu), who are accused of systematic failure and unethical conduct. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political performance (failure to deliver on promises) and personal integrity (trademark theft, unauthorized copying). The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, a clear ethical message is demanded.

The speaker sharply criticized the minister for ignoring proposals from entrepreneurs and resorting to demagoguery, specifically by comparing food producers to tobacco manufacturers. He also attacked fellow member Juku-Kalle Raid for offering inappropriate judgments and displaying ignorance of cultural history, further accusing him of insulting the feelings of religious believers. The criticism targets the political substance, procedural matters, and personal conduct exhibited in the chamber.