By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The speaker is clearly an opposition member, criticizing the Minister of Justice and the government for failing to address the opposition's legislative proposals. The criticism targets the government's procedural passivity and political reluctance to resolve a crucial security matter.

The main opponent is the government coalition, especially the prime minister and the Social Democrats, who are accused of refusing to address security issues. The criticism is both procedural (being used as a rubber stamp) and substantive, accusing certain parties (SDE, Center Party) of representing the interests of residents who hold the values of a terrorist state. The attacks are intense, and no compromise is offered on the security question.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, whose policy regarding the implementation of the Just Transition Fund has been declared a failure. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on the loss of hundreds of jobs and ineffective regulations that allegedly excluded the oil shale chemical industry from receiving funding.

The criticism is aimed at the government's actions concerning the redirection of funds—originally intended for strengthening the electricity grid—to a gas power plant project. The opposition is rooted in policy and budgetary priorities, casting doubt on the government's capacity to guarantee security of supply.

The primary conflict is with the government and the prime minister, who face criticism over their policies (specifically, ignoring defense experts) and procedural missteps (such as shelving the election rights bill). There is also a noted internal storm of indignation within the Reform Party regarding the prime minister's messaging, which points to the government's inherent weakness. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of selectively safeguarding national security.

The main criticism is aimed at the government’s financial policy and the Ministry of Climate’s plan to create new, expensive jobs at a time when the country should be cutting costs. Also under fire are the rules governing the repayment of European Union funds, which are deemed unfair and inflexible, thus hindering the development of new projects. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, focusing primarily on inefficiency.