By Plenary Sessions: Riina Sikkut

Cooperation is deemed necessary at the local level, stressing the need for an agreement between local governments and developers concerning the wind turbine levy and the compensation for resulting disturbances. Cooperation with the University of Tartu is also mentioned regarding the launch of a multi-year health study, demonstrating a willingness to collaborate with research institutions in the acquisition of knowledge.

Demonstrates a strong spirit of cooperation in the legislative process, praising and thanking the experts, ethics specialists, and officials who helped achieve a compromise on the draft bill concerning end-of-life declarations of will. Refers to cooperation within the cabinet as a representative of the Social Democrats, emphasizing shared expectations for the climate ministers.

The speaker referred to a colleague's previous question concerning salary negotiations, demonstrating awareness of the contributions made by other members of parliament and a readiness to continue discussions related to the subject.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs in preparing the draft legislation and commends the substantive, albeit critical, discussion held by the Social Affairs Committee. The need for compromise in the interest of patients is acknowledged, demonstrating an openness to finding solutions.

The style of cooperation is partisan; the speaker represents the positions and values of the Social Democrats, emphasizing what is unacceptable to them. Information regarding a willingness to cooperate or compromise with the opposing side is lacking.

The speaker is seeking cooperation and legal advice from the Chancellor of Justice in order to find the best solution for reducing inequality and increasing justice. They indicate a readiness to address the topic within the Finance Committee, which requires intra-committee cooperation.

The collaborative style is open and supportive. The speaker thanks the members of the Riigikogu for their initiative and emphasizes that the draft bill was prepared together with numerous stakeholders and underwent thorough discussion in the Social Affairs Committee. A readiness is expressed to support the compromise proposal, even if, in the speaker’s estimation, it is not ideal.

The cooperation style is formal and procedural, focusing on work within the Finance Committee, where consensus was achieved regarding procedural decisions. In the substantive discussion with the ministry and Minister Ligi, the role was to clarify the content of the directive and the associated sanctions.