By Years: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The criticism is aimed more at systemic flaws and administrative ambiguity, rather than specific political opponents. He criticizes the situation where politicians are indirectly involved in the management of the courts, labeling this a conflict of interest. He also criticizes parents who abuse their custody rights, as well as the passivity of local authorities when it comes to verifying residency.

The opposition is directed specifically at narrowly focused or populist bills that are deemed insufficiently analyzed or unsuitable for the system. The criticism is mainly policy-based and procedural, highlighting the absence of economic analysis (e.g., concerning the public holiday) or the inadequate complexity of the solution (e.g., security control). For instance, regarding the draft bill on ministerial expenditures, it cited populism and questioned the effectiveness of legal regulation in addressing ethical issues.