By Months: Pipi-Liis Siemann
Total Months: 14
Fully Profiled: 14
10.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and investigative, addressing the respected presenter and posing critical questions. The tone is rather concerned, focusing on logical arguments and highlighting procedural bottlenecks within the public sector. Questions are employed to guide the discussion toward seeking further solutions.
09.2025
18 Speeches
The speaker's style is highly formal, analytical, and procedural, particularly when delivering reports to the commission. The tone is neutral, focusing on conveying facts and procedural decisions. When expressing a personal opinion, they are measured, utilizing logical arguments (such as the registration record of an entry as evidence) and stressing the necessity for a more extended discussion.
06.2025
3 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and question-oriented, respectfully addressing both the chair of the session and the ministers. The speaker employs logical argumentation, focusing on policy mechanisms and procedural correctness, particularly when conveying the details of the commission's work. The tone is businesslike and demanding, especially regarding economic issues, where the necessity of maintaining and improving competitiveness is emphasized.
05.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, a style typical of a Commission representative reporting the substance of discussions to the plenary session. The speaker focuses on facts, questions, and procedural decisions, employing a logical structure and avoiding emotional appeals.
04.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, serious, and expresses concern, directly addressing the esteemed presenter. The speaker employs powerful metaphors (such as "virtual marketplace" and "using as a weapon") and stresses emotional appeal to highlight the unprotected rights of children. The address concludes with solution-seeking questions, underscoring the pressing need for action.
01.2025
1 Speeches
The style of the address is formal, neutral, and strictly procedural, typical of the role of a commission rapporteur. Logical and legal argumentation is employed, focusing on facts, dates, and the commission's voting results (6 in favor, 2 against, 1 abstention). Emotional appeals are entirely absent.
12.2024
5 Speeches
The language used is formal and substantive, stemming from the speaker's role, but it includes strong ethical and moral appeals. They sharply criticize the opponents' rhetoric, labeling it "whataboutism" and populism (whether left- or right-wing populism). To support their position, they use a philosophical quote from Dostoevsky, emphasizing the necessary balance between logical and value-based arguments.
10.2024
2 Speeches
The speaker's style is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the precise reporting of the commission's discussions and procedural decisions. The rhetoric is primarily logical and fact-based, avoiding emotional appeals. In the second speech, the style is directly demanding clarification, requesting specific examples regarding the relevance of removing restrictions.
09.2024
5 Speeches
The speaking style is highly formal, objective, and procedural, which is appropriate for the role of the steering committee's rapporteur. The presenter focuses on conveying facts (who participated, what arguments were heard, what decisions were made), employing a logical and evidence-based approach, citing protocols and expert opinions. Emotional or personal appeals are not used, with the exception of a brief personal comment regarding the fairness of the electoral system.
06.2024
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and procedural, making it suitable for summarizing the Constitutional Committee's discussion for the Riigikogu. The speaker employs logical appeals, contrasting the positions of the Ministry of Justice and the Chancellor of Justice, and characterizing the debate as an "exciting legal discussion." The tone is neutral and fact-based, focusing on communicating the procedural flow and the decisions made.
05.2024
4 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal, courteous, and analytical, focusing on details and procedures. The speaker often poses clarifying or thought-provoking questions to ministers and experts, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals. Presentations are neutral and fact-based, for example, when describing the procedure for appointing a member of the Supreme Court.
03.2024
11 Speeches
The style is formal, analytical, and procedural, focusing on the neutral delivery of the commission's discussions and decisions. The speaker uses logical arguments, referencing the positions and laws of institutions (Kapo, Ministry of the Interior, Government). To criticize the narrow focus, the speaker used a memorable metaphor about the hammer and the nail ("if your only tool is a hammer, then every problem starts to look like a nail").
02.2024
7 Speeches
The style is formal and procedural, as the speaker is presenting the report of the Constitutional Committee, maintaining an analytical and measured tone. He uses logical arguments, drawing upon the committee's discussions and the government’s positions, while simultaneously explaining his personal justifications for rejecting the draft bill.
01.2024
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing the presenter appreciatively ("It is extremely pleasant to listen to"). The speaker employs logical appeals, challenging common assumptions (the reversal of cause and effect) and posing questions to guide the discussion toward seeking national solutions.