By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The rhetorical style is formal and inquisitive, addressing the manager and the presenter. The focus is placed on logical clarification and obtaining specific examples in order to understand the relevance of the law’s application. The tone is cautious, attempting to avoid extreme interpretations ("I don't want to believe that").

The speech is formal, neutral, and procedural, fulfilling the role of a rapporteur in summarizing the committee discussion. The style is logical and fact-based, relying on specific dates, voting results, and the precise referencing of colleagues' arguments (Jaak Valge, Hendrik Johannes Terras, Helir-Valdor Seeder). Emotional appeals are not used; instead, the focus is on the chronology of the proceedings.