By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The political focus is heavily concentrated on border security and the development of the eastern border, particularly concerning drone defense capabilities and their funding. The politician is demanding clarity regarding deadlines and the sources of funding (EU vs. state budget), while stressing the actual current status of the project. There is strong criticism directed at the inefficiency and unfulfilled promises of previous governments, though the current minister's strategy of involving European Union resources is supported. The political framework is primarily results-oriented and performance-based, requiring specific solutions and firm deadlines.

The political stance centers on procedurally regulating the financing and prioritization of cultural sites of national importance. This position is outcome-oriented, stressing the need for clarity regarding the status of specific projects (e.g., Süku's own contribution, the Narva agreements) and calling for a new, workable procedure for compiling a list of priorities. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on the oversight of Parliament's previous decisions (specifically, changes to the list).

The political stance is sharply critical of the direction of the government's energy policy, particularly concerning the unconditional pursuit of the 100% renewable energy target, which is labeled as utopian. The speaker stresses that the policy has failed due to a lack of a holistic vision and a failure to account for the impact on consumer prices and the Estonian economy. Previous support for the 100% goal has now turned to regret, as efforts to achieve it are ignoring other crucial criteria.

The political stance is strongly critical of the proposed vehicle tax bill, calling into question its logic and practical sensibility. The speaker frames their opposition on a values-based foundation, highlighting the injustice of imposing the tax on minivans used by large families and on vehicles essential for national defense. The position is pragmatic, focusing on the negative repercussions of the policy.