By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The rhetorical style is detailed, questioning, and demanding, focusing heavily on facts, deadlines, and contradictions (such as the true objective of the funding). It employs critical and sarcastic language directed at former politicians ("Defense Minister Pevkur ordering drones from China with 'hocus pocus'"). The overall tone is formal, yet deeply concerned about both the delays in completing the border and the government's lack of knowledge regarding current surveillance systems.

The rhetorical style is formal and inquisitive, addressing the minister politely ("Dear Minister!"). The focus is on logical and procedural analysis, emphasizing the need to gain an overview of the factual situation and to offer solutions for the future legislative framework.

The rhetorical style is critical, skeptical, and at times regretful, particularly concerning earlier support for the 100% target. Strong negative descriptors are employed, such as "utopian projects" and "the one and only truth," to highlight the ideological slant of the policy. The appeal is primarily logical and consequence-focused, warning of the danger of economic damage and the creative interpretation of laws.

The rhetorical style is interrogative and analytical, presenting its arguments through a series of rhetorical questions aimed at the Chancellor of Justice. Specific, real-life examples are employed (acquaintances in Southeast Estonia, a jeep versus an electric car) to illustrate the unreasonableness of the policy, relying on logical juxtaposition rather than emotional appeals.