By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political position is tied to the legislative procedure, focusing on the fate of a specific bill. A neutral, rather procedural line is maintained, asking the rapporteur for an assessment regarding the future of the bill. This position is motivated by the need to gain clarity concerning the progress of the legislative work.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance centers on strong opposition to the procedural route of the new bill concerning the financing of cultural objects, deeming it a complicated and unnecessary "back door." Emphasis is placed on the need to preserve the Riigikogu's exclusive right in designating nationally important objects, while criticizing the delegation of authority to the Minister of Culture. The position is strongly procedural, highlighting the value of maintaining a simple and unified system.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on economic competitiveness and stability. The most pressing issues are high electricity prices, the unstable tax and economic environment, and the need to identify new drivers of economic growth. The political approach is solution-oriented, requiring short- and long-term strategies to restore competitiveness. The goal is to ensure that Estonia is competitive, at least in terms of electricity prices.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is strong opposition to the proposed car tax, especially regarding its impact on large families, whom the taxation is seen as oppressing. Another significant issue is energy policy and crisis preparedness, where questions are being raised about the necessity of the government's proposals and potential alternatives (for example, lowering the price of the universal service). The stance is primarily value-based (the protection of families) and critical of the policy.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political stance focuses on the food labeling bill concerning insect additives. The speaker expresses skepticism regarding the effectiveness of the labeling, suspecting that this is driven more by "ideological trends" than by practical policy. The position is aimed at challenging the underlying assumptions of the policy.