By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is no information available regarding specific subject matter expertise, as the question presented is general and concerns the outcome of the draft bill's proceedings, rather than its content. Neither technical terminology nor data references are used.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the history and procedures for financing nationally important cultural structures, accurately referencing the 2021 Riigikogu decision and the logic that has been in effect since 1996. This expertise is evident in the use of technical terminology (e.g., "special regime," "duplicating mechanisms") and the citation of the State Auditor's previous recommendations. Furthermore, the speaker is familiar with the future reporting obligations of the Cultural Endowment Council.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates expertise in macroeconomics, energy policy, and the competitiveness of industry (particularly the food sector). Specific terminology is employed, such as "economic cycle upswing," "business cycle institute," and "profiteering," with references made to analysts at the Bank of Estonia and the International Monetary Fund. This indicates a strong grasp of both the language used in economic analysis and the context surrounding crises.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates expertise in social policy and logistics, emphasizing the specific transportation needs of large families (where increased carrying capacity is an unavoidable necessity). Furthermore, they possess knowledge of energy market regulations, addressing the utilization of reserve capacities, the expediency of the universal service, and the potential merger of the Baltic exchange areas.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker has expressed interest in food safety and labeling regulations, specifically regarding the inclusion of insect additives. They are looking for concrete data and statistics detailing how labeling has affected consumption—whether it has grown or declined—in other countries. This suggests a preference for basing policy evaluation on empirical evidence.