By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The focus is on strategic national defense decisions and government actions (the 1.6 billion decision and the procurement of long-range ammunition), not on specific draft laws or legislative work. The need to resolve the situation concerning ethical issues among defense sector personnel is emphasized.

The legislative focus is on opposing the draft bill for the transposition of the CER Directive (Amendments to the Emergency Act) because it expands the list of critical services. The speaker stresses the need to avoid expanding the scope of the directive (adding extra elements/gold-plating) and criticizes the Government Office for the review that was never carried out. He/She is a strong opponent of the bill.

The legislative focus is aimed at preventing future legal issues that could arise concerning the acceptance of foreign prisoners. The speaker's role is to be the inquirer, seeking an assessment from the Chancellor of Justice before political decisions are made.

The legislative focus is currently directed towards budget implementation and demanding the specific details regarding the financial execution of a major political decision—namely, the broad-based security tax. The speaker is operating in the capacity of an auditor and a detail-demander, concentrating specifically on the plans for tax revenue collection and expenditure.

The legislative focus is on the implementation of the new "broad-based security tax" and monitoring its impact on the defense sector budget. The speaker is acting as a detailed scrutinizer of the government's financial decisions and is demanding clarity regarding the financial plans for the law's implementation.