By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The main focus is on the draft bill concerning healthcare advance directives, where he/she is a substantive opponent because he/she fears the risks associated with it (euthanasia, ambiguity of the simple written form). He/She supports the goal of the draft bill (availability of information), but does not consider it reasonable or necessary in its presented form.

The legislative focus is on opposing the waste reform and conducting a critical analysis of it. The speaker is on the opposing side, emphasizing the reform's shortcomings in setting recycling goals and questioning its impact on the import of waste for incineration. The objective is to determine whether the rights being granted to local governments already exist.

The legislative focus is on granting authorization for the transfer of Swedish prisoners to Estonia, a process which requires parliamentary approval. The speaker is acting as an adversary, attempting to halt or discredit this legislative initiative by demanding clarity regarding its objectives and potential consequences.

The legislative focus is on amendments to the Law on Churches and Congregations and the regulation of a patient's end-of-life declaration of intent. The speaker is a critical opponent who seeks to improve the legal clarity and validity of the draft legislation by submitting an amendment proposal to replace the misleading terminology ("end-of-life declaration of intent") with a clearer expression ("declaration of intent to refuse treatment"). He emphasizes that the legislature must anticipate future amendments to any law that is adopted.

The legislative focus is on amending the Environment Committee's draft bill to regulate noise pollution limit values and planning conditions at the statutory level. The speaker is the initiator of the amendments, focusing on establishing compensation mechanisms and limiting the right of delegation.

The legislative focus is on monitoring the financial transparency and implementation of the waste reform. The speaker positions himself as a critical evaluator of the reform’s costs and goals, demanding accurate financial accounting.

The primary legislative focus is on the proceedings of the supplementary budget bill, where the speaker is acting as a critical scrutinizer. The focus centers on the justification of defense spending and the details regarding the reallocation of repair and development funds within the administrative domain of the Ministry of Culture.