By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

Highly critical of the government's tax strategy, particularly regarding the introduction of the car tax and its subsequent partial softening, viewing this whole affair as political hypocrisy. They also criticize decisions related to corporate income tax, referring to the move as a "rescue" after the taxes had already been imposed.

Economic perspectives focus on the financial impact of regulations, expressing concern that local governments are being granted the right to charge for services they essentially do not provide. Also of concern are the economic aspects of waste import and potential higher fees or exemptions for imported waste.

There is not enough data.

Insufficient data.

Economic perspectives address the regulation of real estate development, stressing the necessity of preventing issues and ensuring the protection of those who have purchased property. There is support for incorporating compensation mechanisms (such as glazing) into the planning process, which indicates a regulatory approach focused on consumer protection and risk prevention.

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal responsibility and concern over the direct cost of regulatory reforms to the taxpayer and society. The speaker calls for clarity regarding the financial price tag of the waste reform, even if it leads to potential savings in EU fines.

Budgetary views emphasize fiscal discipline and the careful timing of expenditures, prioritizing the planning of costs for the next fiscal year. The speaker calls for accountability and transparency when reallocating budget resources (e.g., transferring funds from development projects to repair works).