By Months: Priit Sibul
Total Months: 19
Fully Profiled: 19
10.2025
11 Speeches
The statement is a direct challenge to the person responsible for the proceedings, not an attempt to seek cooperation or compromise. Insufficient data.
09.2025
31 Speeches
The information is scarce. Discussions primarily focus on holding ministers and officials accountable and highlighting errors, rather than on cooperation or seeking compromises.
06.2025
21 Speeches
The style of cooperation is rather oppositional, focusing on the criticism of draft legislation and the submission of amendments. Although it recognizes the proposal by the Chairman of the Environmental Committee to suspend the reading, it largely acts as a critical legislator who does not support bills that, in its assessment, are fundamentally flawed (e.g., the Church Law).
05.2025
20 Speeches
Demonstrates cooperation with colleagues (Rain Epler, Varro Vooglaid) within the scope of parliamentary inquiries and debates. Acknowledges positive steps (e.g., the location of the Võru shooting range being situated away from Tartu) and supports the raising of concerns by local activists (Ilmar Tagel, Anne Vasarik). Is prepared to recognize the minister's correct approach regarding amendments to the Arms Act.
04.2025
8 Speeches
Domestically, the style is confrontational and demands clarity from the government, but internationally, the speaker supports cooperation with European partners in addressing shared concerns (border control) and utilizing European Union funds. He/She emphasizes that the inclusion of European funds is "entirely sensible."
03.2025
15 Speeches
Operating on behalf of the Isamaa faction, he submits draft legislation and interpellations (for instance, alongside Rain Epler). He points to a positive, cross-party consensus within the National Defence Committee regarding the necessity of increasing support for reservists, thereby demonstrating a willingness to cooperate on security matters.
02.2025
14 Speeches
The speaker mentions the Isamaa faction's proposal to change energy policy goals, which suggests faction-based cooperation. In the context of foreign policy, he emphasizes the closer cooperation and security unity among the Nordic-Baltic countries. There is no information regarding the search for a domestic political compromise with the government.
01.2025
12 Speeches
The style of cooperation is faction-centric, requesting an adjournment on behalf of the Isamaa faction and submitting formal inquiries alongside fellow faction members (Solman, Kokk, Seeder, Maastik). When substantiating his viewpoints, he cites the military advice of the Commander of the Defence Forces. Although the speaker begins by thanking Raimond Kaljulaid, he quickly pivots to historical criticism.
12.2024
8 Speeches
The speaker highlighted opportunities for cooperation and consensus, pointing out that Isamaa’s proposal to reduce the administrative burden received support from both Eesti 200 and the Chamber of Commerce. This demonstrates a readiness to back a broad political consensus, even though the commission ultimately did not adopt it. The cooperation style is pragmatic and rises above political divisions when the objective is reducing the administrative burden.
11.2024
27 Speeches
The speaker operates as a member of the Isamaa parliamentary group, but stresses their independence and the radical nature of their personal views (for instance, on abortion) compared to the rest of the group. They collaborate with other opposition MPs (such as Varro Vooglaid) and thank them for bringing up important issues. On behalf of the parliamentary group, they ask for a vote in favor of the proposed amendments.
10.2024
15 Speeches
There is no evidence of cooperation or willingness to compromise with government members; the speaker focuses on directly challenging and criticizing the ministers. Instead of collaborative action, emphasis is placed on previous disagreements and rigid opposition to government policy.
09.2024
11 Speeches
The speaker is acting in opposition, criticizing the government's decisions and processes. While there is no direct mention of cross-party compromise, the speaker does highlight concerns that the government has ignored, which were raised by external organizations (e.g., ITL, general practitioners, the association of health centers) during the transposition of the directive.
07.2024
10 Speeches
The speeches reveal no willingness to compromise or cooperate with the ruling coalition; instead, they focus on sharply criticizing its actions. Reference is made to the positions held by colleagues (e.g., Jaak Valge) and the unstable policies of previous coalitions (Kaja Kallas’ governments) in order to highlight the untrustworthiness of the current administration.
06.2024
15 Speeches
The style of cooperation is rather confrontational; it criticizes the government's inability to achieve consensus before submitting draft legislation and the committee's handling of opposition proposals. It points to the necessity for opposition parties (Isamaa) to discuss their proposals within their parliamentary group, but shows no openness to finding compromises with the coalition.
05.2024
14 Speeches
The speaker primarily operates through an oppositional role, demanding the convening of the Parliament's Board and the removal of the agenda item on religious grounds. He refers to internal discussions within the Isamaa faction but does not mention broad, cross-party cooperation. He acknowledges the improvement of the text, but this does not indicate direct cooperation with the government.
04.2024
13 Speeches
The speaker recognizes the initiatives put forward by colleagues (Urmas, for example) and is looking for solutions, specifically asking what we, as politicians, ought to be doing to solve these societal issues. He attempts to establish a consensus regarding food security and the importance of rural areas, but simultaneously remains critical of the government's ineffective proposed solutions.
03.2024
8 Speeches
The speaker values the substantive discussion in Parliament and expresses gratitude to the ministers for the debate, but their primary form of cooperation is submitting interpellations along with other colleagues (five members of parliament). They are prepared to hear the opinion of the Auditor General and will use it to support their arguments, but remain critical of the Culture Committee's attempts to withdraw the interpellation.
02.2024
17 Speeches
The speaker is seeking support from Riigikogu Vice-Chairman Toomas Kivimäe, urgently requesting the discussion of the query and hoping for his understanding. He refers to colleagues' previous shared thinking on cultural topics, but generally, the presentations are aimed at challenging and criticizing government policy.
01.2024
13 Speeches
The speaker, acting within the opposition faction, is submitting inquiries on behalf of his colleagues from the Isamaa faction (Jaanus Karilaid, Helir-Valdor Seeder, Andres Metsoja, Aivar Kokk). He acknowledges that he shares a similar understanding of the problems concerning the ministers (e.g., the issue of transparency), but still emphasizes that misconduct is present.