By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The speaker's style is forceful and logical, employing strong judgments (e.g., "stupidity," "an outright lie") when criticizing the opposition. He relies on security arguments, international ramifications, and constitutional logic to substantiate his position. Simultaneously, he urges his colleagues to vote according to their personal conscience and better judgment, rather than adhering to party discipline.

The style is critical, direct, and at times combative, particularly when addressing government inaction and issues of injustice (the car tax). The speaker demands logical and calculated answers, employing rhetorical questions and strong language, such as "the wicked plan of officials" and "perverse regional policy." The appeal targets both logic (the requirement for a comprehensive solution in the energy sector) and emotion (punishing rural residents via the car tax).

The style in the first speech is predominantly formal, technical, and logical, focusing on explanations and refuting the government's remarks using pragmatic arguments. In the second speech, the tone becomes sharp and combative, employing an emotionally charged and derogatory phrase ("handwritten scribble") to criticize the foundations of the government's energy policy.

The tone is predominantly critical, accusatory, and insistent, especially when describing the government's activities, using expressions like "ligadi-logadi, killadi-kolladi" [higgledy-piggledy, slapdash]. Both logical arguments (interpretation of the rules of procedure, the message from allies) and emotional appeals (saving money at the expense of pensioners and children with special educational needs) are utilized. The speaker employs rhetorical questions and sharp retorts, accusing the government of making "troika-style" decisions before the debate even begins.

The speaker adopts a highly critical and combative style, particularly when addressing the Prime Minister’s accusations, employing phrases such as "extremely serious accusation" and "megalomania." He supports his logical arguments with detailed financial data, but also incorporates emotional and figurative appeals, notably comparing the planning of wind energy to "the Kilplased carrying light in a bag."