By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

Not enough data

The economic perspective is strongly opposed to tax increases, especially in the context of an economic crisis and high inflation. New taxes are deemed an inadequate way to remedy the economy, and the government is accused of waging a tax war against its own people. The preference is for reducing the tax burden and eliminating existing expenditures (such as abolishing the tax hump) rather than implementing new taxes.

Economic perspectives express caution regarding the use of immigration as a solution to the labor problem, stressing that high-earning and skilled workers already face few restrictions. Concern is voiced over the social expenditures and unsustainability associated with large-scale immigration, especially during crises.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, arguing that they diminish business competitiveness and harm people's livelihoods. He considers the government's tax increases, intended to "cure the economy," to be ineffective. He prefers to avoid implementing new taxes, recommending instead that they scrap the elimination of the non-existent "tax hump," which would yield greater financial savings.

Economic views are strongly opposed to the immigration of cheap labor, considering it a wrong and unpromising approach for establishing economic competitiveness. It supports science-based development and the construction of a welfare state, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining quota policies to restrict low-wage employment.