By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

Insufficient data

The main opponent is the government, which is sharply criticized both procedurally (for the lack of clear standpoints regarding the EU financial perspective) and politically. The government's financial policy is being called a "bungling course," which is leading to an unpredictable situation, a new tax festival, and uncertainty for investors.

The main confrontation is directed at the government (the prime minister and the finance minister) and the Reform Party, criticizing their fiscal policy as "unmanageable." The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the budget deficit and the use of borrowed funds to implement the Reform Party's "tax hump" project. The intensity of the attack is high, accusing the government of irresponsible financial policy.

The main opponents are the governing coalition and its key figures (the Minister of Finance, Michal, Ligi, Kallas). The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of erratic tax policy changes, wrecking the economy, and incompetence. The speaker believes that the government has lost control over expenditures and is laying the groundwork for new tax increases, which must therefore be abandoned.

The main opponent is the coalition government led by the Reform Party, which is accused of conducting an "experiment of a unique nature" on the Estonian economy. Criticism is intense and focuses on policy failures (the tax experiment, the destruction of trust) and the government's incompetence ("a clumsy political agenda"). The speaker also notes that the coalition members themselves do not believe their own rhetoric, given that they walked out of the debate.

The main targets of criticism are the Prime Minister (for fiscal dishonesty) and the Minister of the Interior/Government (for violating fundamental rights and using improper procedure). The criticism is intense and directed both at policy (expanding surveillance/pressure) and procedure (covertly slipping legislation through). The speaker declares that the government has lost confidence, and consequently, it is impossible to support their bills.

The primary criticism is directed at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party-led government, accusing them of irresponsible fiscal policy and concealing governing costs. The critique is intense and accusatory, focusing on political promises (the tax hump) and financial waste (such as the construction of a 60 million euro log structure and the establishment of artificial bogs). The speaker dismisses the Prime Minister’s claims of savings, demanding concrete evidence.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who are associated with the "tax hump" and irresponsible fiscal policy. The criticism is policy- and procedure-centric, accusing the government of suspending budgetary rules and generating the state's long-term debt burden. The intensity of the attack is high, pointing to a political precedent.

The main opposition is directed at the governing parties, the Reform Party and Estonia 200, who are facing criticism over the failed attempt to abolish the car tax and the incompetent planning of the budget. Criticism is also aimed at the behavior of the presiding officer, which is deemed inappropriate and desperate. The opposition is intense, and the government's political will and honesty are being questioned.