By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker, on behalf of Isamaa, supports the political declaration under consideration, placing it in line with previous political declarations. The need for cooperation with "like-minded states" (Estonia and others) is emphasized in order to put pressure on the West to secure military support for Ukraine.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker stresses the necessity of broad-based cooperation, proposing the signing of an economic growth pact with political parties, businesses, and educational organizations. At the same time, the government is criticized for refusing to cooperate and ignoring Isamaa’s proposals, citing the previous "steamroller" approach and "arrogant silence" in response to an offered helping hand.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker focuses on challenging government policy and demanding alternatives from the government itself. There is no indication of cooperation with colleagues or other political parties, and no openness to compromise with the government is evident.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Data regarding the cooperation style is absent, as the speaker is focused on criticizing the government and demanding procedural intervention from the Chairman of the Riigikogu. He does, however, refer to the appeals of business organizations and dozens of interest groups, supporting their position regarding the abolition of the tax.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker calls for robust international cooperation among Western allies (the EU and the USA), but stresses that this cooperation must be geared toward maximum effort. He positions Estonia as the nation that must carry this impetus, pressuring the allies to abandon the "minimum common denominator."
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
A willingness to cooperate with the government is not apparent; the focus remains on rejecting the government’s policy and demanding that they admit their mistakes. Any references to cooperation are limited to citing the positions of organizations representing taxpayers, business organizations, and families with children, in order to demonstrate broad opposition to the car tax.