By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Reinsalu

There is too little data.

Not enough data.

The speaker is highly active in the plenary session, delivering multiple statements and remarks throughout the day, focusing primarily on the debate surrounding the car tax bill and procedural issues. This pattern demonstrates a readiness to engage in procedural disputes with the session chair (specifically concerning the right to reply).

The speaker actively exercises parliamentary oversight, participating in the Q&A session and repeatedly posing questions to the Prime Minister. They refer to recent legislative activity, such as the parliamentary debate on the Isamaa draft resolution, which demonstrates consistent engagement on national defense issues.

The speaker is active during the plenary session of the Riigikogu, presenting and defending the draft resolution put forth by Isamaa. He/She references recent meetings with European politicians (Ursula von der Leyen, Friedrich Merz), demonstrating active international dialogue on the subject of defense funding. His/Her communication style is focused on the continuous exposure of the government’s inaction and the manipulation of figures.

There is not enough data.

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu's information hour, referencing recent media coverage (specifically, Monday's news from ERR) and the amendments that have been submitted in parliament. He stresses that he is aware of the coalition's internal debates, even though he maintains that he has not been included in them.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session by posing questions, referencing previous inquiries and committee meetings (e.g., the Budget Control Committee). This pattern of activity demonstrates systematic monitoring and critical analysis of government operations, including the demanding of specific documents (e.g., electricity price calculations).