By Plenary Sessions: Marek Reinaas

The main criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party and Mr. Reinsalu, who are accused of underestimating the earlier "zero budget" idea and lacking mathematical competence. The criticism is rooted in politics and rhetoric, highlighting Isamaa's assertion that a zero budget has zero impact. Reinsalu is also being accused of potential hypocrisy, given that he proudly lauded the 100 million euro support for Ukraine included in the budget.

The backlash is aimed at the members of parliament who labeled the idea of cutting expense reimbursements as populism and simple-minded, while also criticizing their lack of solidarity with the public. The criticism focuses more on their attitudes and skepticism, rather than on any specific counter-policy. Lauri Laats' question regarding whether the measure goes far enough is also mentioned.

He opposed Aivar Koka, indirectly criticizing his numerical juggling, while still acknowledging its virtuosity and effectiveness. The confrontation is rooted in the conflict between politics and mathematical interpretation, emphasizing that he himself always casts the correct vote, regardless of his mood.