By Agendas: Marek Reinaas

Total Agendas: 28

Fully Profiled: 28

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The style is analytical, yet motivating and optimistic, emphasizing the need to change the mindset (to compete to win, not to lose). The address is formal, but includes a strong call for diligence and wealth creation. The appeal is balanced, relying on both logical arguments (figures) and future optimism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act (654 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The style is formal, substantive, and explanatory, centering on logical and procedural arguments. Procedural speakers stress consensus ("consensus decision"), whereas the minister's responses are specific and illustrative (e.g., the Tallinn-Helsinki tunnel example). Emotional or narrative elements are missing; the focus is on legal precision.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The rhetorical style is critical and questioning, repeatedly employing rhetorical questions to assess the correctness of the incident ("Did... act correctly?"). The address is narrative, detailing the event that took place at the close of the previous session, and concludes with an accusatory speculation about "parliamentary bullying."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (609 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is confident, well-argued, and at times combative, especially when refuting opponents' accusations and labeling them "absurd." The appeals are primarily logical and ideological, stressing the principles of a free market economy and the rule of law. Specific figures are used (a 3,000 euro fine per day, over 30 amendments), and the urgency of the decision-making process is emphasized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Consumer Protection Act (624 SE) - Second Reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The address is formal, substantive, and procedural, focusing on reporting the work of the Economic Affairs Committee and communicating procedural decisions. The tone is neutral and centers on logical appeals, explaining the substance and timeline of the amendments while avoiding emotional expressions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speech is formal, explanatory, and procedural, characteristic of the role of a commission rapporteur presenting a detailed overview to the plenary. The emphasis lies on logical argumentation and the enumeration of facts, intended to demonstrate the broad scope of inclusion and the rigor of the procedure. Repeated emphasis is employed to stress that the process was "very inclusive" and "more than democratic."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The tone is analytical, balanced, and formal, emphasizing data-driven conclusions. It employs both optimism (Estonia's adaptability, IT reputation) and cautionary elements (Trump's tariffs, demographic shift). It uses metaphors, such as "competitiveness is not a sprint, but a marathon," and stresses that "stupid work and cheap labor are being done less."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – third reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The style is direct, explanatory, and fact-based, with the goal of "simply clearing the air" and ensuring that "the facts are established." The rhetoric is logical and neutral, avoiding emotional appeals and focusing on precision.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Draft law amending the Consumer Protection Act § 4 (624 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The speaker's (Reinaas) style is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the objective presentation of the Economic Affairs Committee's discussion and decisions. The tone is descriptive and fact-based, emphasizing the substance of the discussion ("brief, but meaningful discussion"). Emotional appeals are not used; instead, the focus remains on the procedural steps and achieving consensus.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is analytical and direct, focusing on logical and mathematical arguments. The tone towards the opponent is slightly superior and didactic, emphasizing the necessity of getting the numbers straight while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The style is dual: in the first speech, the tone is analytical and procedural, acknowledging the imperfection of lawmaking and offering Solomonic solutions. In the second speech, the style is sharp and confrontational, utilizing mathematical arguments and numerical comparisons to discredit the opponents' positions, emphasizing logic over emotions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and strictly procedural, characteristic of a committee rapporteur's report. The speaker focuses on the accurate reporting of discussions, participants, and voting results, utilizing logical argumentation and citing official responses. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on facts and the course of the proceedings.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
Draft law amending the Public Transport Act (578 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and informative, focusing on the neutral reporting of the Economic Committee’s meetings and decisions. Logical arguments and references to experts and procedural facts are utilized, while emotional appeals are avoided.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, characterized by addressing the minister with due respect. The address itself is analytical, assessing the combination of the minister's portfolio, and culminates in a direct and unequivocal demand for a public explanation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-20
Discussion of the nationally important issue "Plan for the Future of Sport: How to Bring Medals and Get Children Moving"

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.

The style is direct and assertive, indirectly criticizing "moaning" and demanding concrete proposals from the opposing side. An analytical and inquisitive approach is employed, introducing technical terminology and rhetorical questions. The tone is primarily logical and policy-centric, rather than emotional.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The style is formal and respectful, beginning with an acknowledgment of the Foreign Minister's presentation. The tone is analytical and targeted, concentrating on a specific political objective (business diplomacy). A logical appeal is employed, referencing the immediate relevance of the current economic situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is analytical and optimistic concerning the current budget, yet cautionary regarding long-term financial challenges. Logical arguments and political concepts are employed, all while maintaining a formal tone. The objective is to convince the audience that a balance has been achieved, and to present the ideas of Eesti 200 as solutions for the future.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (545 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The style is appreciative and consensus-based, praising the factions for providing their signatures and expressing hope for full support. The speaker uses an emotional appeal (solidarity with society) and describes the length of the process ("so many hours spent sitting") with slight irony. The tone is formal, yet interspersed with personal observations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is confident and balanced, combining personal good humor and a smile with firm political discipline ("I always vote correctly"). The appeal is primarily logical, emphasizing mathematical inevitability as the basis for political decisions. The opponent's presentation is acknowledged as masterful, but the substantive argument is ignored.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic's Government to lower the value-added tax on foodstuffs to 5 percent" (492 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The style of address is formal, objective, and procedure-focused, concentrating on relaying the minutes of the committee session. The presenter relies heavily on documentation and factual reporting, avoiding emotional or personal appeals. He/She employs a brief moment of humor when responding to a question regarding his/her appearance and the polling numbers of Eesti 200.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is analytical and formal, focusing on logical and procedural arguments in defense of the budget methodology. The speaker repeatedly employs the rhetorical question "why?" and mathematical analogies (e.g., the square root of nine) to differentiate between errors of form and substance. The tone is serious and businesslike, while simultaneously conceding existing issues (such as the absurdity of the metrics).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is analytical and persuasive, repeatedly employing the metaphor of the equilibrium point to justify the budget. The tone is optimistic and logical, focusing on the rational justification of political decisions and the presentation of data. The speaker also uses the question "Why?" (in the context of zero-based budgeting) to challenge conventional practices.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Second Reading of the Bill (450 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the State of Qatar for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud, and the Protocol thereto

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The address is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, presenting a fact-based report on the Finance Committee session. A logical structure is employed, referencing dates and consensus decisions, and is devoid of emotional or personal appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the State of Qatar for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud, and its accompanying Protocol (450 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The style of discourse is formal, brief, and strictly focused on procedural facts. The tone is neutral and informative, emphasizing consensus and the speed of decision-making, concluding laconically: "That is all from my side."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Lowering the Value-Added Tax on Domestic Fruits and Vegetables to 5 Percent" (406 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The style of the address is formal, procedural, and descriptive, focusing on a neutral summary of the commission's deliberation. The speaker employs analytical language, characterizing the debate as "intellectually interesting" and "substantive," and emphasizes the presentation of facts rather than emotional appeals. Although the speaker notes that the discussion was emotional, their own tone remains restrained and appropriate for the role of the rapporteur.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The style is formal, analytical, and interrogative, focusing on questions of policy compliance and evaluation. The speaker uses questions to check strategic alignment ("does this align well," "how do you evaluate this"). Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is on the logical connection between the government's plan and the economic committee's discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second reading of the Draft Act (368 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fiscal Fraud, and the Protocol thereto

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the communication of facts and commission decisions. The discourse is concise and logical, avoiding emotional appeals and concentrating solely on the operational procedures of the parliament.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fiscal Fraud, and the Protocol thereto (368 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, which is typical for a committee rapporteur. The speaker employs logical appeals, presenting a fact-based overview of the Finance Committee's discussions and decisions. The tone is concise and purposeful, focusing on advancing the legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling