By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The style is direct, critical, and at times confrontational, focusing on challenging the Minister's attitude and knowledge. Logical appeals and rhetorical questions are employed, demanding specific evidence and clarification regarding both security and the budget. There is a touch of personal sarcasm, referencing the Minister's obsession with "making faces."

The rhetorical style is sharply accusatory and emotional, utilizing strong negative words such as "to malign," "harassed," and "rough treatment." The speaker relies on moral appeals, emphasizing the stress faced by the elderly and their valuable contribution to the country, and frames political changes as deliberate mistreatment. He uses journalistic sources (Argo Ideon in Maaleht) to back up his arguments and presents facts that the minister is unable to refute.

The rhetorical style is critical and interrogative, repeatedly employing rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the government's motives. The tone is argumentative and accusatory, suggesting the government wishes to suppress the issue and hinting at a possible special relationship with the banks. The speaker uses a logical appeal, emphasizing the sheer financial scale.

The rhetorical style is critical and direct, presenting the minister with a pointed political question. The argument is grounded in logic and data (specific figures and thresholds), emphasizing the negative practical impact of the policy on pensioners. The tone is formal and focused on demanding accountability.

The rhetorical style is skeptical and confrontational, expressing distrust towards the government's promises and deeming them comical. Irony and sharp rhetorical questions are employed to emphasize the negative impact of the budget and the government's unreliability. The tone is formal ("Dear Minister") but the content is fiercely critical and grounded in logical argumentation.

The rhetorical style is critical and pressing, highlighting the sheer audacity and brazenness of the perpetrators. The speaker employs logical arguments concerning changes in resources and strategy, but also touches upon the emotional aspect, stressing public expectations regarding police intervention. The style remains formal, posing direct questions and demands to the minister.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and emotional, employing strong judgments like "utterly cynical" and accusing the government of "mocking" families. The speaker poses direct questions to the minister, demanding analysis, but supports their position with a value-based framework, referencing a demographic catastrophe. He contrasts the consumption of a necessary service (healthcare) with excisable products (alcohol, tobacco).

The rhetorical style is sharp, direct, and accusatory, focusing on the Foreign Minister's alleged lying in an interview given to the Estonian Public Broadcasting. A logical appeal is used, comparing Estonia's vote with those of allies and opponents, and ultimatum-like questions are posed regarding trust within the government.

The rhetorical style is formal, but the tone is critical and urgent, emphasizing the seriousness and abnormality of the situation. The speaker uses strong expressions, such as "paying exorbitant money for ultra-slow internet," and relies mainly on data and comparisons with other countries for persuasion. Although critical, he expresses hope regarding the new minister's enthusiasm and readiness to solve the problem.